[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

*Subject*: Re: Math On The Street*From*: Karen Cole <kac@KARENCOLE.COM>*Date*: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:14:53 -0500*Reply-to*: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>*Sender*: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>

Re: Math On The StreetJust to clarify....

MMAP was developed at the Institute for Research on Learning. When IRL folded, all the people and products ended up at WestEd for a time.

-Karen

----- Original Message -----

From: William Cala

To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:40 PM

Subject: Re: Math On The Street

Hmmm. I wonder how Michelle feels about this middle school West Ed project?

BC

----- Original Message -----

From: Karen Cole

To: ARN-L@listsrva.CUA.EDU

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:57 PM

Subject: Re: Math On The Street

You might be interested in the Middle School Math through Applications Project, an NSF-funded curriculum and research project I was part of for several years. It is organized exactly along the lines you suggest. Kids start out with a big problem situation based on the work of math-using professionals like architects, population biologists, and cartographers. In order to solve these problems the need for certain mathematics emerges. Students produce a comprehensive design solution after several weeks of work involving both the problem and the relevant mathematics. You can learn more about it at http://mmap.wested.org/pathways/.

-Karen

----- Original Message -----

From: Michelle in Nevada

To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU

Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:04 PM

Subject: Re: Math On The Street

B"H

You know, I really want to see the schools turn math around. First teach a problem that needs to be solved--a BIG, REAL problem, like trying to figure out the school's budget--then have the kids try to figure out what someone needs to know to solve such a problem, then learn that, then solve the problem.

I think that the problem with Mathematics education is that it has been reduced to a trivia game.

Example: My son, who is eleven, told me he want to learn to make computer games.

"Great!" I said, and I contacted a programmer I know at Brandeis. He sent a beginning but college-level computer book to my son. I said, "Now Connor, this is probably way above you. I don't know if you can understand it. It is COLLEGE LEVEL."

He, of course, lapped that up and wanted, immediately to start reading the book. When he got into it, he discovered that he needed to know how to, for example, measure a circle--circumference, diameter, etc. Things he had never come across.

Then he needed to know about algebra because he needed to enter equations with variables in order for the program to work. Next, he had out his math books. He had an INTEREST in them for the first time in his life because they were suddenly important and relevant to what he wanted to do.

Can't we make this stuff relevant? What happened to shop classes and sewing classes and music classes and art classes where kids needed to measure circles and figure out areas and work with fractions.

Why can't we turn all these video maniacs into programmers?

Relevance is noticeably absent in the "new" school "priorities."

Math on the street is literally, on the street.

Michelle

--

<http://www.CandleLightingTimes.org/shabbos/>

From: Ed Levine <eddie185@YAHOO.COM>

Subject: Math On The Street

If math happens and there's no standardized test to measure it, does

it still count? This article from today's Times addresses the issue.

New York Times, February 7, 2002

PROBLEMS ON THE STREET, SOLVABLE WITH A PENCIL

By YILU ZHAO

In a drizzling rain, a 63-year-old professor, George Nobl, stood on a

stretch of Times Square sidewalk the other day beside an easel

blithely daring passers-by to solve a math problem.

"Fred can paint a room in three hours," the problem, printed in block

letters on paper pinned to the easel, said. "Mary can paint the same

room in two hours. How long will it take them to paint the room

together?"

"Solve the problem, and win a Snickers bar," the message added.

In an area known for bullhorn- wielding sidewalk evangelists,

three-card monte games and even the occasional chess face-off, some

thought Professor Nobl was a con artist. Some figured he was

promoting a candy bar, while others asked whether he was signing

people up for long-distance telephone service. Many walked away, but

quite a few lingered to study the problem.

It turned out Professor Nobl had nothing up his sleeve except a

quirky effort to promote the fun of math. Every Wednesday at noon

since last summer, he has stood on West 42nd Street between Fifth and

Sixth Avenues challenging passers- by in this eccentric fashion.

"If people want to answer those trivial questions in `Who Wants to Be

a Millionaire,' then why not give them a math problem?" he asked.

While he may not be the only person in America complaining about the

fear of math demonstrated by too many students and the conflicting

methods of teaching the subject, he may be the only one to turn

himself into a Johnny Appleseed of math.

Mr. Nobl is a Hungarian-born adjunct math professor at Long Island

City's DeVry Institute, a technical college, and at the Laboratory

Institute of Merchandising, a small Midtown design college, teaching

college algebra and precalculus at both. Educated at Columbia

University, he was a sculptor before he turned to his second passion

- teaching math - seven years ago.

He is now seeking grants to start a nonprofit group to hire a few

teachers who would put up similar stands around the city and

challenge pedestrians with math problems. Eventually, he would like

to instruct teachers on his way of teaching math, which he describes

as proficiency derived from understanding.

"Americans don't naturally hate math," he said. "Look, a lot of

people stop by my stand to think about the problems. It's so easy to

teach math right. Why teach it wrong?"

While Professor Nobl's intent may be quite noble, other advocates

have found less dramatic ways to achieve their goals. Professor Nobl

could publish articles or write to a congressman. Why preach on the

street?

"There is an actor inside me," he said. "I like doing things in the

street." Professor Nobl is blissfully unaware of the heated national

debate about whether understanding is more important than memorizing

formulas for success in math. He says that once a student truly

grasps a rule, getting the correct answer is easy. An approximate

answer will not earn a Snickers bar from him.

"In American classrooms, people memorize this and memorize that,"

Professor Nobl said. "They memorize step one, two, three for certain

problems, and they take the Regents, and then 10 days after the test,

they forget about it all."

When many of his students here told him they hated math, he said:

"Inevitably they had a fourth- or fifth-grade teacher who told them,

`Math isn't about why; it just is.' They see math as an obscure

religion. You perform those steps, and then you are O.K."

On a recent Wednesday, a crowd gathered around Professor Nobl, an

elfish man in a suit and a beret, and after being convinced that he

was not there to bilk pedestrians, some asked him for pencils,

notepads and calculators to scribble some solutions. After a few

minutes, several people in the crowd whispered answers into his ears

by turns, with most of them guessing that the answer was two and a

half hours.

"If it takes one person two hours to paint the room, how come it

would take longer for them to do the task together?" Professor Nobl

asked tartly.

Tom Mansley, a nearby office worker on his way to lunch, was one of

the few who got the correct answer. "You don't need a lot of

mathematical background for this problem, but it's tricky," he said

after calculating on a notepad for five minutes. "I would have stood

here all day in the rain to solve it. I like to meet challenges."

David Williams, a social worker who graduated from public schools in

the Bronx and went on to college, was less lucky. "When I see a word

problem, I don't know which rule to use," Mr. Williams said. "I

remember a lot of rules, but I don't know which one is the right

rule."

For those who stuck around, Professor Nobl explained that the correct

answer is one hour and 12 minutes. Here is how he solved it, he said.

Fred paints a third of a room in one hour, and Mary a half. So

together they can paint five- sixths of a room in an hour. To paint

the entire room, they will need six- fifths of an hour, or an hour

and 12 minutes.

Nine out of 10, Professor Nobl said, get it wrong. Still, his face

lit up when a young man whispered the correct answer barely after

finishing reading the problem.

It turned out that the young man, Ofir Beigel, was not an American

but a tourist from Israel.

__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!

http://greetings.yahoo.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L

to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.

- Prev by Author:
**Re: Math On The Street** - Next by Author:
**essay from Alfie Kohn** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Math On The Street** - Next by thread:
**wasl initiative** - Index(es):