[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Commissioner Defends Nebraska Assessment Against NCLB Disapproval


  • To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
  • Subject: Commissioner Defends Nebraska Assessment Against NCLB Disapproval
  • From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:36:21 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=rlvGkdVbfJ25U3CaEzAubaTMoTyAsVoIKGgK2eEoBLG/nqsmL9FZ5ymxxSkFeGzj; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

EDUCATION OFFICIAL SAYS NEBRASKA'S ASSESSMENTS WORK

Grand Island (Nebraska) Independent -- August 3, 2006
by Harold Reutter

Kearney -- "Hello, I'm Doug Christensen and I'm not approved."

That's how Christensen, Nebraska commissioner of education, joked he felt he should begin his opening address to superintendents, principals and other school officials during Administrators' Day in Kearney.

But Christensen promised the more than 600 school officials who gathered in Kearney Wednesday that Nebraska's system of assessing student achievement would be approved by the U.S. Department of Education.

Nebraska is one of only two states -- Maine is the other -- whose assessment systems have been designated "not approved" by the U.S. Department of Education under the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

Christensen alternately cracked jokes about the situation and criticized federal officials for the action.

He said he believes the U.S. Department of Education designation has caused a great deal of public confusion over the situation in Nebraska.

He assured people the "not approved" label has nothing to do with the assessments themselves. Christensen said Nebraska is "not approved" because it must provide documentation of the technical quality of its assessments.

Christensen and other officials in the Nebraska Department of Education have always known they must provide that documentation.

He said the NDE originally had an agreement with the U.S. Department of Education to provide that documentation by the 2007-08 school year. He said federal education officials moved that date up to the 2006-07 school year.

Nebraska's "not approved" status occurred because federal officials did not believe the state could meet that deadline. Christensen said the NDE can comply with the deadline.

He said a timeline of Nebraska's plan to prove that it has high quality assessments can be found on the NDE Web site at www.nde.state.ne.us. That online document promises to provide most of the documentation by Sept. 30 , while providing the remaining proof by June 15, 2007.

Christensen said he is most disappointed not in what No Child Left Behind currently is, but that it is not living up to what it could become.

He said the whole point of school reform should be "excellence and equity," which means high standards while trying to reach every student.

Christensen said he is afraid that NCLB has become more about compliance and looking good than about improving student achievement.

Christensen said one state has won praise for doing particularly well on the National Assessment of Educational Progress or NAEP. However, that praise overlooks the fact that 19 percent of the state's students are excluded from taking the NAEP.

He said the federal government is giving low rankings to states such as Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin, which traditionally do very well on NAEP, the ACT and SAT college entrance examinations, and other standardized tests.

Other states whose students do not perform nearly as well on those tests have often gotten higher marks under the federal No Child Left Behind law, Christensen contended.

Nebraska is unique among the 50 states because it allows each of its 250 school districts to devise its own assessments of student achievement.

Christensen said the most important evaluation of students should be the formative assessments done by classroom teachers as students are learning.

He said he has received support for that stance from other state education officials, some of whom have told him that Nebraska is in the place they believe their states should go.


http://www.theindependent.com/stories/080306/new_20060803007.shtml




Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: