[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Spinning NCLB "accountability" as civil rights: neocon girly manhood !?!
- To: arn-l@interversity.org, fcarforum@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Spinning NCLB "accountability" as civil rights: neocon girly manhood !?!
- From: QCao009@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:43:55 EDT
_Black is white_ (
http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/black_white)
Submitted by _Rick Perlstein_
(
http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/user/rick_perlstein) on August 6, 2007 - 8:55am.
When I wrote about the Supreme Court's monstrously mendacious decision to
ban local school districts from seeking racial fairness, I was especially
offended by Chief Justice Roberts' formulation, “the way to stop discrimination on
the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."
Historian Nancy McClean has now published an amazing little essay in which
she reveals the workshops that churned out this Orwellian notion. "Roberts’s
decision," she writes, "is replete with quotable phrases from the lexicon
conservative strategists honed in their think tanks in the 1970s and then carried
into the nation’s courtrooms through their various legal societies."
Here's the story:
[H]ow did National Review greet the Brown decision? Frank Meyer, its
founding co-editor and the leading conservative movement builder in the formative
years, called the high court’s decision a “rape of the Constitution.”
To fight the implementation of Brown, Buckley and Meyer forged an alliance
with the intellectual architect of “massive resistance,” James Jackson
Kilpatrick. Kilpatrick’s agitation against school desegregation as editor of the
Richmond News Leader earned him praise as “one of the South’s most talented
leaders” from the Mississippi-based white Citizens’ Councils then working to
crush the civil rights movement.
Buckley traded mailing lists with this avid white supremacist organization
in 1958, assuring its leader that “Our position on states’ rights is the same
as your own.” Indeed, it was. What made “the White community” in the South “
entitled” to use any means necessary to keep blacks from voting, Buckley had
editorialized the year before, was that “it is the advanced race” so its “
claims of civilization supersede those of universal suffrage.”
But calling the emancipation of black schoolchildren a "rape," and calling
blacks civilizationally inferior, wasn't flying with the public. So they did
what conservative do: borrowed from the black arts of corporation public
relations.
They were tutored by northern neo-conservatives like Irving Kristol, who in
1964 warned Buckley of the “political folly” of arguing against school
desegregation “in terms of racial differences.” Buckley and his allies wisely
dropped the racial rationales and most now say that they regret their earlier
arguments.
But their core commitments stayed the same. To fight social justice,
conservative spokesmen simply mastered the art of rhetorical jujitsu. They seized
the civil rights movement’s greatest strength--its moral power–to defeat its
goals. They complained less and less that civil rights measures violated
property rights, aided communists or elevated racial inferiors. Instead,
conservatives claimed that civil rights measures themselves discriminated.
“I am getting to be like the Catholic convert who became more Catholic than
the Pope,” Kilpatrick marveled in 1978 about his own altered phraseology. “
If it is wrong to discriminate by reason of race or sex,” intoned the
outspoken enemy of civil rights, “well, then, it is wrong to discriminate by reason
of race or sex.”
The former segregationists now portrayed themselves as the true advocates of
fairness. They framed “the egalitarians,” in Kilpatrick’s words, as “worse
racists--much worse racists--than the old Southern bigots.”...
Yes: quite literally, they argued that black was white. Read the whole essay
_here_ (
http://hnn.us/articles/41501.html) , then groove to Nancy's _book _
(
http://www.amazon.com/Freedom-Not-Enough-Workplace-Foundation/dp/0674019091/ref
=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-0698794-2006438?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1186404043&sr=8-1)
Freedom Is Not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace.
Quan
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
Post a Message to arn-l: