[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: commentary supporting multiple measures
NCLB already calls for multiple measures and has done so from the
start. USDOE chose to adopt regulations that kind of undercut that.
In any event, you can go multiply wrong with multiple measures more
easily than multiply right.
Art
-----Original Message-----
From: Monty Neill <monty@fairtest.org>
To: RScriticalteach <RScriticalteach@lists.execpc.com>;
ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com; ARN-state@yahoogroups.com; ARN-L
<arn-l@interversity.org>; arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 8:53 am
Subject: [arn-l] commentary supporting multiple measures
My commentary on why Congress should support multiple forms of
assessment and
multiple measures for decision making is on PULSE - a website for the
journal
District Administration - at
http://www.districtadministration.com/pulse/ about
3 or 4 items from the top.
Monty
Monty Neill, Ed.D.
Co-Executive Director
FairTest
342 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02139
617-864-4810 fax 617-497-2224
monty@fairtest.org
http://www.fairtest.org
Donate:
https://secure.entango.com/servlet/donate/MnrXjT8MQqk------------------------------------------------
Direct list questions to listmom@interversity.net
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.
Post a Message to arn-l: