[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: good letter on testing's impact in Chicago
- To: monty@fairtest.org, RScriticalteach@lists.execpc.com, ARN-state@yahoogroups.com, arn-l@interversity.org
- Subject: Re: good letter on testing's impact in Chicago
- From: Csubstance@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:07:20 EDT
8/30/07
All:
The 2005 Illinois State tests (especially the ISAT, the elementary test) is
one of the best examples in history of how to create a test to work wonders in
an election year.
The data from the 2005-2006 ISAT were scheduled to be released around the
beginning of the 2006-2007 school year. But that was not the real interest that
political leaders in Illinois had in the ISAT results.
2006-2007 was an election year!
The governor was up for re-election in November 2006.
The Mayor of Chicago was up for re-election in February 2007.
So everyone made sure that the ISAT scores went "up."
The time for taking the test was lengthened.
The questions were (according to some critics) made easier.
And the "proficiency" level was made lower.
Voila!
Across Illinois -- and especially in Chicago -- a miraculous rise in ISAT
scores was announced.
The governor was re-elected by a landslide.
The mayor was re-elected by a landslide.
Who says such tests don't correlate to something?
By the way, the test items, scoring information, norming, and all technical
data are still secret.
I'm still waiting for the rest of us to demand that all tests be completely
transparent once they have been given. Of course, in the case of the three or
four most recent ISAT years in Illinois, that openness will have to go back a
few years for people to make comparisons.
Given that AERA was in Chicago (April 2007) after all these miraculous events
took place in Chicago and Illinois, you'd have thought that Chicago's school
administrators would have flocked to AERA to explain to the psychometricians
what a miracle had just taken place in the town that hosted their annual
conference.
Sadly, however, nobody from the top dogs at CPS managed to make it to AERA.
Dan Bugler, who was chief of testing, was busy with other things.
Arne Duncan, the CEO of CPS, was away, too.
So was Barbara Eason Watkins, the "Chief Education Officer" of CPS.
In fact, the only people who were prominent from Chicago at AERA were from
the Consortium (University of Chicago), who somehow managed not to question (at
least in the sessions I attended) anything about Chicago's recent miracles.
George N. Schmidt
Editor, Substance
www.substancenews.net<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR>
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour</HTML>
Post a Message to arn-l: