[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Edison again


  • Subject: Re: Edison again
  • From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:51:43 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <15.d91689b.2775e0be@aol.com>
  • Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
  • Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>

In fact, the AFT website has a research section, which has an extensive
refutation of Edison's mendacious claims of success. Lots of charts and
graphs to show how Edison publicity dept fishes for favorable data and
hides the rest. I used this stuff a while ago to shoot down the early
stages of a proposal in my district to bring in Edison.

Pete Farruggio




At 03:04 AM 12/23/00, you wrote:
Hello (and holiday greetings), Judi...

Edison is one of those times when you might get your money's worth for your
union dues. Both the AFT and the NEA have opposed it since Whittle began.
Their research departments probably could provide more detail than you could
want about Edison's PR nonsense and repeated failures.

George Schmidt

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.


Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: