Re: NCLB help!!!!

["Young, Alan" <alan.young@DMPS.K12.IA.US>]

In fact more than 7% goes to testing corporations, publishers and the like bypassing the kids and teachers. It would be a net gain by far to just say no.

Alan

> ----------
> From:         Art Burke
> Reply To:     Assessment Reform Network Mailing List
> Sent:         Tuesday, December 3, 2002 12:27 PM
> To:   ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
> Subject:      Re: NCLB help!!!!
> 
> Let me save the taxpayers' money on the study.  The state is free to refuse resources under ESEA.  That would shrink the state education budget by around 7-10 percent.  I'm sure the citizens of Washington would just jump at the chance to make up the difference.
> 
> Art 
> 
> >>> Jedoyon@AOL.COM 12/03/02 10:02AM >>>
> In a message dated 12/3/2002 9:51:40 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> rparkany@BORG.COM writes:
> 
> > is the product of Bubbaism
> 
> Well, the man in the white house is the best evidence AGAINST Social
> Promotion I can think of.  And, as I told the teacher writing the column,
> when I am superintendent, the first operation I set up, utilizing the highly
> capable staff at OSPI rather than importing expensive outside consultants,
> will be a feasibility study on ESEA REFUSAL.
> 
> Analize that.
> Juanita
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.