[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: NCLB help!!!!


  • Subject: Re: NCLB help!!!!
  • From: William Cala <wcala@ROCHESTER.RR.COM>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 17:46:05 -0500
  • Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
  • Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>

The NCLB legislation requires that the 3-8 tests be DIAGNOSTIC. This is a critical factor. In NY, none of the current tests are diagnostic. That means that they will have to be scrapped. I do not believe that many (or any) of the state tests across the nation are diagnostic in nature, ergo the same predicament.

Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Jedoyon@AOL.COM
To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:27 PM
Subject: NCLB help!!!!


Does anyone have a good enough handle on NCLB to confirm, refute, or expound on these statements? I have a teacher on my list who is trying to write a column including the idea that we could scrap WASL and use better means to fulfill NCLB.

from the Spokesman-Review:
"Current state testing forms the baseline by
which improvement must be measured."

from the teacher:
"I was under the impression that we were not required by the federal mandate to
continue using the WASL; i.e., other tests could be used to show the required
improvement."


Thanks,
Juanita

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: