[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ABurke5054@aol.com = DELETE


  • To: arn-l@interversity.org
  • Subject: Re: ABurke5054@aol.com = DELETE
  • From: leoecasey@optonline.net
  • Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:36:46 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <20061204113232.BB5DB22C1D@interversity.biz>
  • References: <20061204113232.BB5DB22C1D@interversity.biz>

It's immanent criticism. No critique is quite so devastating as that which shows that, on its own terms, the argument is srlf-contradictory.

----- Original Message -----

> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:43:11 EST
> From: Csubstance@aol.com
> To: arn-l@interversity.org
> Subject: ABurke5054@aol.com = DELETE
> Message-ID: <4f7.878cd0d.32a555bf@aol.com>
>
> 12/4/06
>
> Although I disagree often with Leo Casey, I advise that someone
> share with
> him the advice many of us share regularly:
>
> DELETE ART BURKE
>
> or, put another way:
>
> ABurke5054@aol.com = DELETE
>
> I keep a check list and go back to Art once every 30 to 60 days
> just to see
> if he's still the same. Some times I get caught reading something
> of his that
> some honest person gets trapped forwarding as part of a more mature
> discussion.
> That always makes me sad.
>
> And now I'm feeling sad that Leo is fuming about Art, although
> angry because
> apparently Leo has to slap around ARN at the same time.
>
> Happy Holidays, shipmates,
>
>
> George N. Schmidt
> Editor, Substance
> www.substancenews.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of [arn-l Digest] Vol. 3 No. 311 Messages: 7
> **********
>



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: