[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Students take Exit Exam concerns to Capitol




The town hall meeting described in
the article is viewable online. Go to
http://www.calchannel.com/search.htm,
enter the date "120706", and click "Submit".

Two programs come up, but they appear
to be identical. That's a bit strange -- I've
never before seen an "Assembly Hearing"
without any Assemblymembers -- but it does
match what the SacBee article describes.

--Erwin



George Sheridan wrote:
Students take exam angst to Capitol
===================================


By Peter Hecht - Bee Capitol Bureau

Published Friday, December 8, 2006
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A4
http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/89459.html


Luciana Reyes, 17, stood up in the audience at a unique Capitol hearing on the
California High School Exit Exam with tears in her eyes and her voice bursting
with anguish.

"It's hard for people like me," she began, instantly fighting back sobs. "It's
every parent's dream for us to pass the exit exam. But it's hard. Why can't
students who work very hard at school and get good grades, why can't they pass on
that?"

On Thursday, the senior from Hiram Johnson High School was directly questioning
education officials and state policymakers on the required exit exam that is now
the curse of her academic existence.

It was a particularly spirited session of the LegiSchool Project. The program,
part of a series sponsored by the Legislature and California State University,
Sacramento, brings high school students to the Capitol to take on politicians and
policymakers on burning issues of the day.

Students from seven California secondary schools, including Sacramento-area Hiram
Johnson, McClatchy and Galt high schools, packed a Capitol hearing room for an
intense town hall-style meeting.

With thousands of other students throughout California viewing the meeting on
cable television, they debated the importance of the exit exam and dilemmas faced
by 38,000 students from the 2006 class who failed to graduate because they
couldn't pass the exam.

Now that is Reyes' fear. The daughter of an American Indian mother and a Mexican
immigrant father who speaks little English, she says she has managed to get
mostly A's and B's in a Law and Criminal Justice Academy program at Hiram
Johnson.

She wants to be a police officer. But suddenly Reyes sees her dreams slipping
away. She has passed the English portion of the exit exam, but has come up short
in math.

"I have to stress a lot," said Reyes, who will take the exit exam again in
February. "I have a senior project to do. Now I have to stress about two things."

The panel Reyes was speaking to included Lily Roberts, the state Education
Department's manager for the high school exit exam, and Marisol Avina, a
consultant to the Assembly Education Committee.

Roberts had just finished saying how "proud" she was that 90 percent of state
high school students had passed the exit exam -- a competency test in reading,
writing and math -- in 2006, the first year it was required.

Now she was hearing the other side of the story.

Responding to comments from some students that the exam puts an unfair burden on
students with learning disabilities or others for whom English is a second
language, Roberts said the Education Department has included $70 million in its
current year budget for "intensive intervention" to help them pass the test.

"We want to close the achievement gap," she said.

Kangzoua Khang, 17, a senior at McClatchy High School, says she is trying to do
the same thing. Khang passed the test -- on her second try. But two older
brothers failed. They all grew up speaking a Hmong dialect with no written
language.

Now Khang is volunteering by teaching fellow Hmong students to read and write.
But she told panelists they should get rid of the exam requirement because it
disproportionately singles out people from other cultures.

"I'm pretty sure there are hundreds of slow learners throughout California,"
Khang said. "There might be a language barrier. For me, English is a second
language. It takes me more time to study."

Cyndi Swindle, a panelist at the hearing and an assistant principal at Hiram
Johnson, said the challenge of passing the exam is greater for many students --
but worth the effort.

Swindle, who works with students with learning problems, said she had a learning
disability as a child but went on to earn a master's degree.

"I used to have to sit in college and read every chapter four times," she said.
"That's why I'm (working) in special ed.

"This year, I had several students with learning disabilities passing" the exit
exam. "It gives me great hope."


About the writer:

The Bee's Peter Hecht can be reached at (916) 326-5539 or phecht@sacbee.com.


Comments

There are 37 comments posted so far. Below is a sampling of the latest comments.

Add Your Comments | View All Comments
http://www.sacbee.com/dyn/comments/standard/comments_separate.html?uri=http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/89459.html&o=d&ud=u&avatar=n&tie_to=89459

*

cmub at 5:20 AM PST Friday, December 8, 2006 wrote:



We must ask ourselves whether it is better to eliminate the test and lower
the educational standard ... more

*

anubis1911 at 7:28 AM PST Friday, December 8, 2006 wrote:



We have a love affair of standardized exams and a whole population of people
who have good understan... more

*

netguru at 8:07 AM PST Friday, December 8, 2006 wrote:



I believe letting these kids off without passing the exam will only
contribute to the "dumbing down"... more

George Sheridan
-------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe ARN-L:
http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/subscribe.html




Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: