[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Democracy in Compton


  • To: arn-l@interversity.org
  • Subject: Democracy in Compton
  • From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:39:18 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=jps.net; b=RcBcaicoin0BOAu6aSg7gi6cTNhPzKufTAnyn1JQgS68oSPltO+tIm1RktfdE89B; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>

So far as I know, no one has brought forward any evidence that the Compton parents' revolt against "Parent Revolution" was anything other than a spontaneous grass roots reaction of parents who were outraged that they had been deceived.

"Parent Revolution" tried to pull a fast one. They successfully collected signatures for the "parent trigger" without a lot of publicity, so that the local teachers union and the California Teachers Association did not know what they were doing. That's smart politics, except that when parents complained they had been duped, CTA could not be blamed because CTA had not yet heard about the whole affair.

It's not democracy when people are lied to in order to obtain their signatures on a petition they do not in fact support.

It is democracy, or at least an affirmation of democratic values, when parents insist that an outside group like "Parent Revolution" does not speak for them. And the truth in this matter is not easily buried, even by the Los Angeles Times, when the whole affair was broadcast live by TV cameras arranged by "Parent Revolution."

-----Original Message-----
>From: aburke5054@aol.com
>Sent: Dec 12, 2010 12:12 PM
>To: arn-l@interversity.org
>Subject: Re: [arn-l] ompton Parents Charge Barr and Austin's "Parent Revolution"...
>
>This list is a never-ending source of examples of people who claim they are all for democracy and local control erupting in paroxysms of rage when parents exercise rights that threaten the status quo. Special interests in education, like special interests elsewhere, like changes that suit themselves and resist changes that don't. Are you really surprised that supporters of the status quo are fomenting counter-revolution? In any event, keep trying to make this about corporations and not about parents fed up with schools that don't meet their child's needs because that is clearly working out well for you.
>
>Finally, I guess you missed where the LAT said , "The parent trigger is a promising initiative based on the idea that parents are smart enough to have a hand in determining the future of their children's schools."
>
>
>
>Art
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Horn <ontogenyx@gmail.com>
>To: arn-l <arn-l@interversity.org>; epata <epata@interversity.org>
>Sent: Sat, Dec 11, 2010 7:05 pm
>Subject: [arn-l] ompton Parents Charge Barr and Austin's "Parent Revolution"...
>
>
>> Compton Parents Charge Barr and Austin's "Parent Revolution"With
>
>> Deception, Manipulation, and Lies
>
>>
>
>> In what will likely go down in corporate ed reform history as the
>
>> Compton Caper, the otherwise disgusting LATimes is reporting that
>
>> Compton parents are coming forward with allegations of strong-arming
>
>> and deception by Parent Revolution to get enough signatures to
>
>> charterize a public school that has recently demonstrated strong
>
>> improvement on state test scores.
>
>>
>
>> Sensing an all-out repudiation by the school community of the
>
>> oligarch-funded front group, Parent Revolution, Austin and Barr
>
>> called up the Governator and L.A.'s plutocratic mayor to try to get
>
>> ahead of the story. The spin from the oligarchs? The parents who
>
>> have been lied to and manipulated are the real culprits, as they
>
>> represent anti-charter forces who are trying to undercut the will of
>
>> the oligarchs people. This clearly shows the depth of the
>
>> corruption, and it clearly goes all the way down to the Governor's
>
>> Office.
>
>>
>
>> Tempers flared Friday over the fate of a low-performing Compton
>
>> elementary school that has become the first target of a new law
>
>> allowing parents to mandate school shutdowns or charter-school
>
>> conversions through a petition drive.
>
>>
>
>> Some parents are rescinding their signatures to convert McKinley
>
>> Elementary into a charter school that would operate outside the
>
>> direct control of the Compton Unified School District. Under the
>
>> state's new "parent-trigger" law, which is being scrutinized
>
>> nationwide, the signatures of at least half the parents at a campus
>
>> are required in order to launch the changes.
>
>>
>
>> But that 50% threshold could be at risk at McKinley. Opponents say
>
>> that 50 to 60 parents already have withdrawn their support, which
>
>> could push the total close to the minimum level required.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> "They told me the petition was to beautify the school," said Karla
>
>> Garcia, whose two children attend McKinley. "They are misinforming
>
>> the parents, so I revoked my signature."
>
>>
>
>> Garcia is part of a growing countermovement that began with the
>
>> delivery on Tuesday of the parent-trigger petition at Compton
>
>> Unified headquarters.
>
>>
>
>> Parent Revolution, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit group that
>
>> organized the petition drive, denied any wrongdoing. Organizers said
>
>> they had collected signatures representing 62% of McKinley's 438
>
>> students. Initially, media coverage focused almost exclusively on
>
>> dissatisfied parents relating grievances against McKinley, where
>
>> test scores rank in the state's lowest 10% of schools, even when
>
>> compared with schools that serve students from similar backgrounds.
>
>>
>
>> The school's Parent Teacher Assn. held two meetings Thursday in
>
>> which parents said they had been harassed or deceived into signing.
>
>>
>
>> On Friday, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a supporter of the parent-
>
>> trigger effort, took the other side, condemning alleged
>
>> "intimidation tactics" by charter opponents at McKinley.
>
>>
>
>> Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa weighed in with similar
>
>> views. The mayor was flanked by parents and petition organizers
>
>> Friday as he visited the home of a Compton petition signer to praise
>
>> the effort and condemn what he described as harassment by opponents.
>
>>
>
>> "It's particularly alarming to see these parents resort to the kind
>
>> of intimidation, the kind of smear campaigning, the kind of rumor-
>
>> mongering that is all too reminiscent of the way bad employers try
>
>> to intimidate working people," Villaraigosa said.
>
>>
>
>> Parent Revolution, which is led by state Board of Education member
>
>> Ben Austin, had arranged for Villaraigosa's appearance. But the
>
>> visit sparked angry reactions from about two dozen parents and
>
>> Compton leaders. Some demonstrators chanted "No charter school!" and
>
>> carried signs reading, "Our Kids Are Not for Sale" outside the home
>
>> where the mayor spoke.
>
>>
>
>> Parent Revolution had targeted Compton and McKinley for its first
>
>> organizing effort. The group also decided that the petition would
>
>> stipulate a charter conversion and it selected the charter operator,
>
>> Celerity Educational Group.
>
>>
>
>> "I am highly offended by an outsider coming in telling people here
>
>> how to handle my children or handle my school," said Lee Finnie, a
>
>> pastor and parent of three McKinley students.
>
>>
>
>> Finnie and other petition opponents cited McKinley's recent
>
>> progress, noting its rising test scores and new principal. The
>
>> school's 77-point two-year rise on the state Academic Performance
>
>> Index puts it among the most rapidly improving schools in the state.
>
>>
>
>> "Why blow up something that's improving?" Finnie said. "Rome wasn't
>
>> built in a day."
>
>>
>
>> The school has made "excellent progress," said Olivia Fuentes, a
>
>> specialist in the division for school improvement with the Los
>
>> Angeles County Office of Education. . . .
>
>> By the way, what Legislature would vote to allow the democratic
>
>> process to be hijacked by the parents of any public school? The
>
>> public school is supported by all taxpayers in the community, not
>
>> just the ones with kids enrolled. What about parents with children
>
>> about to start school? Or taxpayers without children, for that
>
>> matter. Obviously, the customer service model of democracy has taken
>
>> over entirely in California.
>
>>
>
>> --
>
>> Posted By Jim Horn to Schools Matter at 12/11/2010 09:59:00 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe ARN-L:
>http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/subscribe.html




Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: