[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Figures Don't Lie - Iowa Rules! & Warren Buffet


  • Subject: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Figures Don't Lie - Iowa Rules! & Warren Buffet
  • From: Mike Kluznik <mkluznik@HOTMAIL.COM>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:50:15 -0500
  • Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
  • Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>

From: tdkluznik@uswest.net
Reply-To: tdkluznik@uswest.net
To: "Mike Kluznik" <mkluznik@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Figures Don't Lie - Iowa Rules! & Warren Buffet
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 17:10:16 -0600

Mike,
My suggestion to teachers and others interested in stopping
this train wreck is
to point out that the business process is far from perfect
and regularly leads
to very disappointing results. For example, Xerox is a
financial basket case and
Daimler-Chryler is closing plants. I am sure that both
companies had incentive
plans which rewarded their top performers. In addition, I am
sure that each
company had quarterly goals, as well as Vision and Mission
Statements. So, if
both companies followed the business model why is one
(Xerox) likely not to
exist in the near future and the other (Daimler-Chysler) to
be quite different
in the near future? Do we want to apply the business model
which is notorious
for focusing on short term goals (i.e., Quarterly Earnings)
when dealing with
something so complex and long-term as the education of our
children? Children
are educated over 18-22 years and it is not possible to say
at age 14 that a
child will or will not be a success based on any test.
Further more, how do we
define success?
Ted

Mike Kluznik wrote:

> >From: Mike Kluznik <mkluznik@HOTMAIL.COM>
> >Reply-To: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
> >To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
> >Subject: Re: Figures Don't Lie - Iowa Rules! & Warren Buffet
> >Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:22:13 -0500
> >
> >Excellent points, Monty.
> >Isn't there one state out of the 50 that doesn't use high-stakes
testing?
> >And isn't that state Nebraska?
> >For sake of argument, let's say it is Nebraska. The latter state is
where
> >Warren Buffet lives. He is considered the most succesful investor in
> >history. I recently finished a book about him. There are many
simplistic
> >ways of evaluating a company and its stock. However, Buffet eschews
such
> >simplistic methods. He would never judge a company by using only one
> >factor. He looks at a wide variety of factors, including simply
whether he
> >feels comfortable in evaluating a particular company. For example, he
has
> >stayed away from high-tech stocks such as Microsoft, partly because he
says
> >he simply doesn't understand them. On the other hand, he understands
what
> >Dairy Queen is all about, so he bought it.
> >When he evaluates a company, he expends a lot of time and energy doing
a
> >comprehensive and thoughtful analysis.
> >I doubt that Warren Buffet would ever evaluate a school based on one
set of
> >test scores. In any case, we would do well to incorporate his
philosophy
> >into evaluating schools. We should look at many factors.
> >When the Why-Aren't-Schools-Run-More-Like-Businesses crowd whines about
> >public schools, they conveniently forget about business people like
Buffet.
> >Good luck on the Today show.
> >Mike
> >P.S. For those of you who don't know anything about investing, Warrn
Buffet
> >didn't sing "Margaritaville" and he doesn't wear jeans & loud Hawaain
(sp?)
> >shirts. That's his brother Jimmy Buffet.
> >
> >>From: Monty Neill <monty@FAIRTEST.ORG>
> >>Reply-To: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
> >>To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
> >>Subject: Re: Figures Don't Lie - Iowa Rules!
> >>Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:46:55 -0500
> >>
> >>I would not argue causation. Most lower-scoring states with more tests
> >>and higher stakes are southern states with historically weaker
education
> >>systems. They moved to testing to "improve" schools on the cheap (and
> >>had state-centralized systems, making it easier to implement), and in
> >>some cases leveraged the tests for more money for schools.
Improvements
> >>have been marginal however, so the point is not that testing causes
> >>lower scores in these states but that 1) it does not induce
improvement,
> >>and 2) why adopt an improvement strategy from states that have the
worst
> >>systems and can't show improvement on independent measures and have
the
> >>worst dropout rates?
> >>
> >>Monty Neill
> >>
> >>Laura VaN wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >From: Monty Neill <monty@FAIRTEST.ORG>
> >> > >FairTest has also shown that states with less testing and lower
stakes
> >> > >also tend to make better progress on NAEP than state with more
testing
> >> > >and higher stakes. Monty Neill
> >> >
> >> > I wonder whether this is because they don't test, or because their
> >> > population is such that they haven't felt the "crises" (real or
> >>imagined).
> >> > Iowa (the example I know about) I believe still does test the
students
> >>-
> >>and
> >> > the test scores come out fairly well so that I wonder if they just
> >>haven't
> >> > felt the need to attach high stakes to the tests. MOre simply - is
> >>this
> >> > causation or correlation?
> >> >
> >> > remember to speak out again the silencing of dissent
> >> > goto http://angelfire.com/fl4/eca
> >> >
> >> > _________________________________________________________________
> >> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >> >
> >> >
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> >> > to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
> >>
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> >>to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> >to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.


Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: