[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lights Retention Scale


  • Subject: Re: Lights Retention Scale
  • From: Bob <BDeBuhr@EXCITE.COM>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:19:51 -0800
  • Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
  • Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>

If you don't really want to take into consideration the rest of the child's
world - use the Lights - it is a very nice way to let a parent know that
their child is "not cutting the mustard" and making it sound like you know
what your talking about. Very cold!

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:16:16 -0500, Assessment Reform Network Mailing List
wrote:

> It's been around for at least 20 years. It went through one revision, I
> believe. It is not standardized, has no norms, etc. It's merely meant
to
> be a tool employed in the decision-making process. It's based on
research
> in the journals.
> I can't tell you too much more than that, except to say I'm not sure I
would
> have spent my sabbatical year in 84-85 studying retention/promotion if
I'd
> run across the LRT earlier. I highly recommend it.
> MK
>
>
> >From: "Allen Flanigan." <Allen.Flanigan@USPTO.GOV>
> >Reply-To: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
> >To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
> >Subject: Lights Retention Scale
> >Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:57:46 -0500
> >
> >I am very intrigued by this Retention Scale. Can anyone give me more
> >background and info on this? How old is it? I've heard the
conventional
> >wisdom about retention increasing the chances of dropouts, and holding a
> >student back twice being a virtual guarantee of eventually dropping out
of
> >school. Are kids held back according to these guidelines doing better
in
> >terms of actual outcomes than the dismal figures commonly cited on
> >retention? (I realize of course that other factors will probably figure
> >into the ultimate outcomes for any given student).
> >
> >The question lying in the back of my mind, I guess, is if this scale is
> >meant to limit retention only to those situations where potential for
> >educational harm is minimized, if it would be a good idea to recommend
its
> >use in place of decisions based primarily on whether a student passes
(or
> >is
> >expected to pass) state assessments. I like the fact, too, that the
scale
> >bears caveats about using the "scores" as guidelines only. If only our
> >Virginia tests had such sensible warnings.
> >
> >Allen Flanigan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mkluznik@HOTMAIL.COM [SMTP:mkluznik@HOTMAIL.COM]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:03 AM
> > > To: ARN-L@listsrva.CUA.EDU
> > > Subject: Re: retention
> > >
> > > Thank you. Good old Academic Therapy. I had forgotten the
publisher.
> > > The edition of the Light's Retention Scale I have is tucked away in a
> >box
> > > somewhere. The introduction in the manual provided an excellent
summary
> > > of retention...product of graded schools, product of the Industrial
> > > Revolution...used more extensively on boys, minorities, kids short in
> > > stature, etc. The introduction is good, and the scale itself is
very,
> > > very helpful.
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > P.S. The articles in NASP's "Best Practices Manual" (vol. 1 or 2, or
> >both)
> > > are also helpful.
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Erwin Morton
> > > >Reply-To: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List
> > > >To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
> > > >Subject: Re: retention
> > > >Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:25:53 -0800
> > > >
> > > >Mike Kluznick wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Also, there is something called the Light's Retention Scale. I
> >forget
> > > who
> > > > > publishes it, but again, you could do a search for it or go
through
> > > the
> > > > > special ed. catalogs in your district office.
> > > >
> > > >First, try this link:
> > > >
> > > >http://kinder.cmsd.bc.ca/kinder-l/2000/0002/0615.html
> > > >
> > > >Second, go to the publisher:
> > > >
> > > >http://www.academictherapy.com/
> > > >
> > > >--Erwin Morton
> > > >emorton@bigfoot.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > >To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> > > >to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <http://explorer.msn.com>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L to
> > > LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
> >
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> >to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.


Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: