[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Public education just a form of empty obedience


  • Subject: Public education just a form of empty obedience
  • From: Carol Holst <kceh@AIRMAIL.NET>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:42:14 -0500
  • Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
  • Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>

HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section:
Viewpoints, Outlook


Feb. 24, 2002, 6:29PM

Public education just a form of empty obedience

By CRISPIN SARTWELL

THERE'S no such thing as public education. Education happens to exactly
one person at a time.

There are some things that you just have to do by yourself. Even if I'm
your teacher, you can't have my education; your education is a private
task that is given to yourself.

The education of someone or everyone else doesn't add a single item to
your stock of knowledge.

And there's no such thing as compulsory education. Education is
something that each of us gives to ourselves or allows others to give
us.
Otherwise we call it indoctrination or assault; we don't call it
knowledge.

In my son's elementary school, there is a slogan plastered on the walls:
"Have the courage to stand up for what you believe."

No one actually sees it at all: It's a form of wallpaper. It's not
intended to communicate information but to sweeten our day with words so
often repeated that no one's brain gets any traction on them anymore.
They are nothing more than a set of high-sounding nonsense syllables.

Besides that, it is utterly dishonest. The people who put up that sign
want anything, everything, except for your child to have the courage to
stand up for what she believes.

The reason my son, Vince, and I were in the school in the first place
was because Vince had refused to take a test. He sat there quietly but
simply refused to make any marks on the paper, although he thought the
test was easy.

Asked why, Vince said that the material was stupid, and that it was
exactly the same thing he had been learning in health for the last
several
years: how to make decisions, how to deal with stress, etc. -- stuff
Vince doesn't think bears repeating.

You could put it like this: It had suddenly dawned on Vince that he was
the one who was responsible for his own education.

So together, we went to the school to get the health textbook. I read
the chapter. The material was goofy, and perhaps not what you'd usually
think of as education, but it wasn't moronically written or sheer
propaganda.

Personally, I'd have taken the test.

But they weren't giving me the test. They were giving it to Vince, who
seemed suddenly to have come across the courage to stand up for what
he believed.

And then the teacher explained to me why Vince had to take the test,
aside from the fact that he'd get a zero: "It is approved curriculum."

Or putting it another way: It's public education -- the standardized
information we hope to insert into everyone's head simultaneously.

Stand up for what you believe? Teachers are required to teach the
approved curricula like a little chorus of playback devices. Their
success is
measured by mechanical performance on standardized tests.

No large institution values independent thought, and public schools
actively despise and punish it; they demand and attempt to enforce and
reward mindless obedience. That, and not algebra, is what they are
designed to teach. That is their fundamental purpose, the real
justification
of their existence.

If you don't believe this to be true, notice that refusing to take a a
test on the grounds that you object to the material is treated in
exactly the
same way as acting up on the playground. The punishment (we'll call your
parents, send you to the principal, suspend you) is the same. For
the institution, the infraction is the same: disobedience. That Vince's
refusal was a principled intellectual objection is irrelevant to the
institution, because the institution has nothing to do with principles
or with intellect.

What the public schools want from our children and for that matter from
their own teachers is just what the Soviet Union wanted from its
citizens: a continual enactment of the empty forms of obedience,
continual self-betrayal.

You can call that freedom and courage if you want, but that doesn't mean
it isn't slavery and cowardice.

Vince is going to take the test. The teacher will assign him a number --
his grade. That number will not reflect the measurement of what Vince
knows. That was never the point.

That number represents one thing: obedience to the institution.

Sartwell is chairman of humanities and sciences at the Maryland
Institute College of Art in Baltimore.
============
Hm.
--
See you at The Soapbox!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.


Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: