[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

The Teaching Commission


  • To: arn-l@interversity.org
  • Subject: The Teaching Commission
  • From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:42:38 -0800

On January 14, Lou Gerstner and a group of the usual suspects repackaged much of the corporatist "standards and accountability" program as a call to "fundamentally upgrade teaching as a profession." You can read their press release at http://www.theteachingcommission.org/

Here's the way the story was reported by Education Intelligence Agency, an anti-union newsletter I read regularly to find out what opponents are thinking.

*
Can Teaching Commission Succeed Where Others Have Failed? The Teaching Commission is a group that was put together by former IBM Chairman Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Its members are a distinguished panel of past and present members of the education establishment. Last month, the commission released ?Teaching at Risk: A Call to Action.? The study?s recommendations are surprising only in the context of the report?s signatories, who are hardly wild-eyed reformers or members of the vast right wing conspiracy.

The commission has 19 members, including former Democratic governors James Hunt and Roy Barnes, former U.S. Secretary of Education (under Clinton) Richard Riley, current San Francisco schools superintendent Arlene Ackerman and, most significantly of all, AFT President Sandra Feldman. ?Our members have unanimously signed off on the report,? stated Gerstner, and immediately declared the report?s purpose to be to ?break through the barriers to meaningful improvement efforts ? such as low standards, low, lockstep pay, mistrust of efforts to identify what makes for effective teaching, education schools out of touch with current school needs, and outmoded and inflexible work rules and district regulations ? so that student learning, rather than teacher protection, is the number one priority.?

Gerstner calls for ?a new compact with teachers,? which would include raising salaries, ?while also asking teachers to be measured and compensated based on their classroom performance, including the academic gains made by their students. We also propose higher pay for teaching subjects such as math and science, and for working in our toughest classrooms.?

<SNIP>

The report calls the single salary schedule ?outmoded? and says it ?removes the possibility of reward for success and accountability for failure.? It decries seniority and tenure rules that protect poor teachers. It advocates higher pay for teachers, but states unequivocally that ?any across-the-board increase in teacher pay must be combined with a pay-for-performance approach.?

The commission also gives attention to a long-neglected area: the teacher career track. Under the current system, most teachers have the same duties and responsibilities for the entirety of their careers. Advancement similar to that of other professions only occurs by entering administration. The commission calls for a career track of mentor, master and lead teachers ? with commensurate increases in pay and responsibilities ? so that teachers don't have to leave the classroom to get ahead.

?The Teaching Commission will not measure its success by what it recommends,? said Gerstner. ?Its effectiveness will be determined by its ability to bring these ideas to life at the federal, state, and local levels.? The makeup of the commission brings some hope of revitalizing an education reform that was beginning to fade.

George Sheridan


Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: