[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: the Underground of "Professional" writing assessment graders
- Subject: Re: the Underground of "Professional" writing assessment graders
- From: George Cunningham <gkc@LOUISVILLE.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:50:14 -0500
- In-reply-to: <3A653219.AE79403C@igc.org>
- Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
- Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
Susan,
But, of course a test cannot be valid unless it is first of all reliable.
There are plenty of valid NRT/MC tests. Few constructed response tests can
be valid because they lack the necessary quality of reliability.
George K. Cunningham
University of Louisville
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List
> [
mailto:ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU]On Behalf Of Susan Harman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:48 AM
> To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
> Subject: Re: the Underground of "Professional" writing assessment
> graders
>
>
> > but no one with even a minimal understanding of measurement and
> > reliability would seriously try to assert that
> constructed-response items
> > are more reliable than multiple-choice items.
> >
> > George K. Cunningham
> The Learning Record is extremely reliable. But then, reliability is
> trivial in comparison to validity, which no NRT, multiple choice test
> has. Neither construct nor consequential.
> Susan
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
> to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
Post a Message to arn-l: