[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: No Child Left Glued to the Table



Joe, what do you do if you are a principal and your district tells you that your teachers MUST follow the script exactly, and that they cannot use any materials other than the Reading First "scientific" materials or you will lose funding?

The example from Buffalo is just one of many. In Long Beach, CA, districts were forced by the state department of ed to adopt Open Court, and then were forced to accept Open Court monitors who roamed the halls to ensure everyone was on the same page at the same time.

At Downer Elementary in CA, teachers had to accept the surprise visits from CTB McGraw Hill reps who are the publishers of Open Court, who were there to ensure that teachers were only using Open Court and were strictly adhering to the script. Teachers who complained were involuntarily transferred out of the school and are now barred from entering Downer since they've been labeled as adversive.

In another school which will go unnamed, teachers are forced to agree to a gag order. They are not allowed to talk to anyone outside the classroom (e.g. the media) and if they complain about the narrow restrictive nature of scripted programs, they are labeled troublemakers. And in yet another school where a colleague works, when she questioned the research behind DIBELS testing, she was silenced by the staff and administration who told her it was rude for her to challenge the wisdom of adopting the test. She was subsequently involuntarily transferred as well for trying to advocate for her students - her attempts to show what best practice was based on scads of research and 20 years of experience was rewarded with a 24 hour notice to vacate her classroom...





Priscilla Gutierrez
Outreach Specialist
New Mexico School for the Deaf

....change is inevitable, growth is optional...





From: "Joseph Bottini" <jpbottini@adelphia.net>
Reply-To: arn-l@interversity.org
To: <arn-l@interversity.org>
Subject: Re: [arn-l] No Child Left Glued to the Table
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:37:01 -0500

Art:



You are way off base on this one.

The point is rigid scrip for instruction leaves little room for teacher
decision-making, as too what is deemed an emergency.

My 5 year old granddaughter should expect to have the teacher's attention if
she is "all glued" due to an accident as described.



The Principal needs to take Common Sense 101 over again, I think.



Joe Bo



_____

From: arn-l-owner@interversity.org [mailto:arn-l-owner@interversity.org] On
Behalf Of aburke5054@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:01 AM
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Subject: Re: [arn-l] No Child Left Glued to the Table



This silliness has nothing to do with scientific reading instruction
(whatever that is) and everything to do with the poor judgment of people
working in the schools. When schools can't cope with little kids handling
bottles of glue, blaming NCLB is quite a stretch.

Art


-----Original Message-----
From: pgutpgut@msn.com
To: arn-l@interversity.org; LiteracyForAll@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 7:37 AM
Subject: [arn-l] No Child Left Glued to the Table

Susan Ohanian posted this on her announcements today, and it is one more
painful example of scientific reading instruction run amok. Highly qualified
teachers under Reading First mandates mean following the script, even if it
makes no sense to do so...

"We are being instructed that during SMALL GROUP INSTRUCTION, teachers are
NOT to interact with other students. Now last year kindergarten teachers
tried to explain how difficult it was to keep 5-year-olds quietly busy with
only Harcourt materials while we teachers worked with a small group.

Let's say you have 24 children, with 7 in a group. This means 17 kids are
sitting for up to 40 minutes. . . quietly and NOT DISTURBING THE TEACHER.

The principal was observing one of the kindergarten teachers during small
group time and a little 5-year-old with special needs using glue had the
horrific experience of the top coming off of the bottle. Understandably,
that child went up to the teacher--THE ADULT IN CHARGE. Also
understandably--and professionally--the teacher got up to help this child.

That evening, the teacher got an email from the principal telling her SHE IS
NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO ENGAGE WITH OTHER STUDENTS during small group
instruction (unless there is a real emergency)!

Here was a 5-year-old, covered in glue. What was he/she to do--get STUCK TO
THE TABLE waiting for 20 minutes until the teacher finished with that one
group?

GROWN-UPS, EDUCATED PEOPLE, ARE LOSING THEIR MINDS HERE IN BUFFALO, and we
are supposed to condone this form of child abuse! "

- teacher
Buffalo School System
2007-01-10



Priscilla Gutierrez
Outreach Specialist
New Mexico School for the Deaf

....change is inevitable, growth is optional...


_____

size=2 width="100%" align=center>


<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=ht
tp%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom%2Fnewaol> Check out the new AOL. Most
comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions
of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.






Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: