[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Just what we need
- To: arn-l@interversity.org
- Subject: Re: Just what we need
- From: Bussardre@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:56:24 EST
The curious thing in this piece in the Washington Times is Romer's apparent
change of heart about a year-round school calendar. He and Gingrich write:
"Another area that merits closer inspection is school calendars. Our current
academic years continue to be scheduled as if they are straight out of the
19th-century agrarian model, when kids were needed during the afternoons and
summers to help perform work around the home or farm. As a result, American
children spend less time learning than their foreign peers. If we expect
American students to be competitive, then we must find ways to get them more
effective classroom time."
Several times when he was LA school supt. he decried the impact of the
year-round calendar on the schools.
And did Romer not learn anything from the Williams V. California lawsuit in
which the year-round calendar used more in Los Angeles than any other place in
the nation was cited as an education detriment?
And Kenneth Gold documented in his book on the origin of the school year
that the year-round calendar is actually more like the agrarian calendar of old.
Maybe Romer's age has finally caught up with him and his memory is failing
him.
--Billee Bussard
In a message dated 12/13/2007 10:09:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
QCao009@aol.com writes:
In a message dated 12/13/2007 9:13:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
taunar@plateautel.net writes:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071213/EDITORIAL/1
12130005
Advice from Roy Romer and Newt Gingrich. It's pathetic. Obviously they do
not read Bracey or Rothstein or anything that challenges the conventional
wisdom. Look at these snips, just weak paraphrases of ANAR:
"America is falling behind its global competitors and the economic security
of our children is at risk."
"If an American corporation produced such mediocre outcomes, then the CEO
would be fired immediately. Yet, American schools continue to churn out
below-average students with no fear of consequences."
A big "if" which is baseless. No, our corporations do not fire the CEO.
We
give him a golden parachute and send him to the next corporation to
practice
the same shill. We reelect the same Yale MBA-bought exec to be the
deciderator for another 4 yrs. The schools are just a reflection of our
social mores
and our values no longer value knowledge and education.
The BOLD thinking that the Bush family pushes is accountability based on
testing ? Roy and Newt as education experts? Was Bennett not available to
make
up the three stooges ? May be we can give Roy and Newt some costumes and
try
them out for lion tamers in our next reality show. That should connect
with
the next gen a whole lot more than the boogey child from another country.
Even if we accept the premise that America is "falling behind", everything
these whiners suggested is pushing us further down.
Quan
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
Post a Message to arn-l: