[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: high-stakes testing has real shock value, so when do we stop pressing the button
- To: Assessment Reform Network <arn-l@interversity.org>
- Subject: Re: high-stakes testing has real shock value, so when do we stop pressing the button
- From: Brian LeCloux <neaguy@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:42:27 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <4F163B3C.3070003@fairtest.org>
- References: <4F163B3C.3070003@fairtest.org>
Monty,In another version of the experiment Milgram found that when two other "teachers" were in the room and both objected to the procedure of shocking the "learner" for incorrect responses, only 4 were willing to go all the way to the 450 volt level in obeying the authority figure. Brian
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:23:40 -0500
> From: monty@fairtest.org
> To: arn-l@interversity.org; arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com; ARN-state@yahoogroups.com; epata@interversity.org; ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [arn-l] high-stakes testing has real shock value, so when do we stop pressing the button
>
> Morna McDermott writes fine columns for the Baltimore Education Reform
> Examiner. On Dec 31, she posted this:
>
>
http://www.examiner.com/education-reform-in-baltimore/high-stakes-testing-has-real-shock-value-so-when-do-we-stop-pressing-the-button
>
> She asks why do teachers go along with high-stakes testing, and looks to
> Stanley Milgram's famous study in which "teachers" (regular folks)
> administered electric shocks (not really, but heard taped cries and
> screams) to 'students' (who were not students). Two-thirds kept on
> administering shocks as the 'dose' increased; when 'teachers' expressed
> concern, they were prodded to continue.
>
> Milgram wrote:
>
> / The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience
> <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obedience> //are of enormous importance,
> but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete
> situations ... Stark authority was pitted against the subjects'
> [participants'] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and,
> with the subjects' [participants'] ears ringing with the screams of the
> victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of
> adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority
> constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently
> demanding explanation/.
>
> Morna draws lessons from this about the difficulty of resisting
> authority, and the necessity to do so in the face of the damage caused
> by the testing regime. As we well know, at times people do rise up and
> resist authority. This needs to be such a time.
>
> Monty
> --
> Monty Neill, Ed.D.; Executive Director, FairTest; P.O. Box 300204,
> Jamaica Plain, MA 02130; 617-477-9792;
http://www.fairtest.org; Donate
> to FairTest:
https://secure.entango.com/donate/MnrXjT8MQqk
> -------------------------------------------------------
> ARN-L archives:
>
http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives.html
Post a Message to arn-l: