[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Public Schools Perform Near Private Ones in Study
- To: arn-l@interversity.org
- Subject: Re: Public Schools Perform Near Private Ones in Study
- From: Csubstance@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 04:36:10 EDT
July 16, 2006
The attack on public schools has been a fraud since "A Nation at Risk" (or,
if you follow Jerry Bracey's studies, as far back as Sputnik).
The current attack(s) date to "A Nation at Risk".
The study that just came out should have raised a different question. If
average and above average (usually suburban) public schools are doing so well, why
do so many wealthy individuals insist on sending their children to expensive
private schools?
Perhaps it is to insure that their children don't mingle too intimately with
the children of lesser parents. You may not be able to buy your kid a 34 ACT
or a 2400 SAT by spending $20,000 or $30,000 a year on private school, but you
certainly can insulate that child from the kind of economic and racial
diversity that comes in most public schools. Many private school choices are really
based on thinly veiled prejudices of one kind of another. But those who are
wealthy enough to make those choices rarely have to submit to the kinds of
sociological and other scrutiny that are the lot of the poor and working class.
And that's one of the main reasons for the private school choice -- snobbery.
If challenging academic and extra curricular programs were really what people
wanted, they wouldn't be wasting all that money on places that have little or
none of either. And to be honest, most of Chicago's most expensive private
schools offer less in terms of academic challenge and equally less in terms of
extra-curricular. They do self-promote madly (like Chicago charter schools).
One of the ironies of the Ed Dept report is that they proved what we already
knew, but are unwilling to admit it.
Part of my summer I'm spending with some student athletes (baseball) on a
team that combines very high quality ("Babe Ruth" level) players from public and
private schools. Both academically and athletically, our public school kids
from Chicago are doing as well as their teammates from the private schools. The
big difference is that the private school families are spending tuition and
fees at five figures a year for a high school education for their children.
George Schmidt
Editor, Substance
Post a Message to arn-l: