[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
The High Price of Boosting Test Scores
- To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: The High Price of Boosting Test Scores
- From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:39:04 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=YhfiK/fVfN9M3Zcl8c1pdQjAsGizOt3K5hhq0pMdf495IoQSu0b0TQNE2Lq7Hl7L; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
HIGHER TEST SCORES COME AT A HIGH PRICE TO EDUCATION
Baltimore Sun Opinion Column -- July 11, 2006
by John Monahan
Great news: Test scores for Maryland students went up. Politicians,
education officials and school administrators have been congratulating
themselves on the achievement. Even the scores in Baltimore went up. Do
you know what that means? Absolutely nothing.
That's right, it doesn't mean anything because the test doesn't measure
or predict anything. Higher scores don't mean that children are better
educated, are more likely to graduate or have a better chance of getting
into college or have a well-paying job.
We're told that the tests measure academic achievement. Education
officials, while scrambling to find cover from the No Bureaucrat Left
Behind law, like to tout these rising scores, saying they indicate the
improvement of education in the state.
What they don't tell you is that the increasing scores measure only the
schools' ability to prepare students for the tests. The schools are
frequently putting all of their energy and resources into test
preparation, to the exclusion of everything else.
I experienced an illustrative example of this while teaching high school
biology. In the perennial struggle to cram an ever-increasing curriculum
into a single school year, I was trying to prioritize which units to
emphasize and which ones to survey quickly. I assumed that much of the
human body unit was redundant because all of my 11th-grade biology
students had taken health class. I was horrified to discover that none
of them had. These were city 11th-graders who hadn't yet gotten a basic
knowledge of how to keep themselves healthy or prevent sexually
transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies. The reason for this
flagrant omission was simple: There was no High School Assessment for
health.
Incoming freshmen must pass the tests in English, algebra, American
government and biology in order to graduate. Everything from the morning
announcements to their class schedules to the length of class periods
was directed toward the goal of getting them to pass these four tests.
School administrators are highly motivated to do this because the scores
are used to evaluate the schools. Funding, staffing, even the future of
whether some schools will exist hinges upon the scores in these four areas.
Students were told every day, both directly and subtly, that all anyone
cared about were the test scores. Weeks of valuable and limited class
time were taken up preparing for the tests. Students were repeatedly
given practice questions from previous tests. The entire curriculum was
designed with the goal of improving test scores.
None of the higher-ups seemed terribly concerned about whether the
students understood the material. Topics that the test emphasized were
to be emphasized in class. For instance, a great deal of the biology
test features questions about the chemistry of living things, so biology
class was moved from the ninth-grade curriculum to the 11th grade in
order for the students to have chemistry first.
Evolution is one of the most fundamental elements to understanding
modern biology, but only one or two questions on the biology assessments
were about evolution. It was consequently de-emphasized in the
curriculum. Classification, animal behavior, the fossil record - all
were given short shrift. Why? They're not on the test.
I'm sure this phenomenon is not isolated to biology. Ask an algebra
teacher how much of the test is algebra. Ask a social studies teacher
which aspects of American government the test emphasizes and which it
omits.
This type of test-driven mania calls into question the real goal of
education. Is it to give students a fundamental understanding of all of
the subjects they will need to be informed, healthy, successful
citizens? Or is the role of education simply to raise test scores so
politicians and bureaucrats will have something to brag about?
John Monahan teaches science at Patterson High School in Baltimore. His
e-mail is gurpsman@hotmail.com.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.tests11jul11,0,7447211.story?coll=bal-oped-headlines
Post a Message to arn-l: