[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Lieberman for Merit Pay


  • To: "ARN-L" <arn-l@interversity.org>
  • Subject: Lieberman for Merit Pay
  • From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:20:37 -0700

This column appeared originally in the Washington Post.

Do public schools need educators who can produce higher test scores?



Joseph I. Lieberman: A lesson from D.C. schools
===============================================


By Joseph Lieberman -

Published in The Sacramento Bee Tuesday, July 22, 2008
http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1098498.html

Michelle Rhee should be commended for her determination to implement courageous
and innovative educational reforms in the District of Columbia, and Congress
should take note as it considers reshaping the No Child Left Behind Act.

When Mayor Adrian Fenty appointed Rhee chancellor of D.C. public schools in June
2007, she inherited a system that was near the top nationally in per-pupil
spending but ranked among the nation's worst in the percentage of its students
who were proficient in reading and math as measured on the National Assessment of
Educational Progress.

Clearly, taxpayer money was not being put to good use. Nor were students being
well served.

Rhee took office determined to reform the system's unresponsive bureaucracy so
that D.C. schools would deliver for parents and their children. She had to make
tough choices about marshaling resources and dealing with failing schools. Her
bold steps have led to some dramatically positive results, and her initiatives
are worth noting: She has dismissed 100 administrators, closed 23 schools and
given notice to 38 principals, 23 assistant principals, 250 teachers and 500
teacher's aides. She has moved to put effective principals and teachers in every
school and classroom, to this end recruiting motivated principals who share her
belief in the use of data to assess student progress and make adjustments.

She seeks to reward teachers for good performance. While this is common, indeed
intuitive, in most professions, it is considered a revolutionary concept in
public education. Most union-negotiated teacher contracts base compensation on
seniority. While this approach offers job security, it does not reward teachers
for inspiring enthusiasm or promoting achievement in the classroom. This hurts
children, particularly those from low-income families. Rhee proposes offering
teachers the choice of staying in the seniority system or giving up their
seniority and tenure rights in exchange for the opportunity to earn as much as
$131,000 a year for raising student performance.

The results, after Chancellor Rhee's first year in the job: The D.C.
Comprehensive Assessment System data released this month show that the
proficiency of fourth-graders rose 11 percentage points in math and eight points
in reading. For eighth-graders, proficiency increased nine percentage points in
reading and math. All are substantial increases from previous years. While other
factors are in play, including the mandate of No Child Left Behind, this is
stunning progress in one year.

Innovative practices are being introduced in other jurisdictions as well. In
Prince George's County, Md., for example, Superintendent John E. Deasy is
planning to offer bonuses of up to $10,000 for exceptional teachers who choose to
participate in an incentive pilot program. And in New York City, Chancellor Joel
Klein has sought major reforms, including enhancing the charter school system,
rewarding successful schools, closing the worst schools and evaluating teachers
in part on the basis of their students' progress.

The original No Child Left Behind law recognized the importance of teacher
quality but did not properly emphasize teacher performance in the classroom. The
reforms in the District of Columbia and elsewhere offer a lesson for national
policy-makers: To best serve our nation's children, Congress needs to fix No
Child Left Behind rather than abandon it. Lawmakers can do this by identifying,
promoting and rewarding successful teachers; by better targeting professional
development; and by strengthening provisions that hold teachers accountable for
the performance of their students.

Congress should encourage states to develop programs that attract the best and
brightest teachers to the public schools, and we should ensure that educators are
given the compensation they deserve. The innovations here in Washington and in
school districts across the country demonstrate how this approach to education
can work.

We owe it to all of America's children to ensure that they have every opportunity
to succeed in the 21st century. The way forward includes enhancing teacher
quality and insisting on high standards and accountability. The vitality of the
American dream and the strength of the American economy depend on it.


George Sheridan



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: