[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: GED is about grade 6?
- Subject: Re: GED is about grade 6?
- From: Arthur Hu <ArthurH@TANGIS.COM>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:30:14 -0700
- Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
- Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
You missed the punch line. These are the final grade level results:
GLE and Content analysis for NYTimes Front Page 7June00
by Rick Parkany
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/Resources/NYTimesGLE.htm
<
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/Resources/NYTimesGLE.htm>
Articles came out average
Fliech 12.3
Colman-liau 12.37
Bomuth 10.70
Fleish Kincaid 11.07
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Parkany [
mailto:rparkany@BORG.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:37 AM
To: ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU
Subject: Re: GED is about grade 6?
Bob: though you missed my point, in my reply to Art last evening, I
concede that the NYTimes reading level as *7th grade level* IS an urban
legend (and not a canard on my part). Indeed, Bob, your anecdotal rule of
thumb assessment was right on the money, as well...
To begin my penance, accordingly, I have supplied the following analysis
based upon sifting the 3 main articles from the NYTimes late edition today
into Lotus Millennium's WordPro. Here are the results (limited though they
are to 3 articles on one day--a representative, yet statistically
insignificant sampling, I concede), I hope this helps, and as a penance,
it's got to be better than having had my tongue cut out or my fingers lopped
off!
Keep well... ;-} rap.
GOTO :
NYTimesGLE <
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/Resources/NYTimesGLE.htm> :
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/Resources/NYTimesGLE.htm
<
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/Resources/NYTimesGLE.htm>
(NOTE: Art1: Mideast Talks Are to Reopen Next Week in the U.S. By DEBORAH
SONTAG ; Art2: Corzine Defeats Florio for Senate Nomination By DAVID M.
HALBFINGER; Art3: Millions Facing Rise in Rates on AT&T Calls By STEPHEN
LABATON)
Bob Schaeffer wrote:
Rick Parkany wrote:
>
> Well, Art: *New*? the NYTimes used to be pegged @ *7th grade level* for
> reading, as per content and form analysis. What does THIS tell you about
> norms. But, then again, what, exactly, DO norms tell us, beyond how clever
our
> proxies for reality and the true stuff of the educational experience are?
Rick and others:
I've seen the statement that the NYTimes is written/edited at a "7th
grade level" on this listserv several times and believe the claim is a
canard or, perhaps, an urban (newspaper) legend.
...SNIP...
Does anyone have any hard evidence (i.e. a citeable source) to
support or dispute the reading level claim? I may just run MS Word's
grammar checker -- which includes several readability measures -- on
some sample NYTimes articles to see what college dropout Bill Gates says
on this matter.
Bob Schaeffer, Public Education Director
FairTest: National Center for Fair & Open Testing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
--
"Dein Wachstum sei feste und lache vor Lust!
Deines Herzens Trefflichkeit / hat dir selbst das Feld bereit',
auf dem du bluehen musst." Peasant, Richard A. Parkany: SUNY@Albany
Prometheus Educational Services -
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/
<
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/>
Upper Hudson & Mohawk Valleys; New York State, USA
Post a Message to arn-l: