[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Fw: hickok
See the story about growing evidence of tutoring fraud:
http://transformeducation.blogspot.com/2006/05/more-evidence-of-
tutoring-fraud.html
See also my post on the complete lack of accountability of private,
for-profit SES providers:
http://transformeducation.blogspot.com/2006/05/private-tutoring-
companies-are-not.html
According to a 4/5/06 report from the federal dept. of ed, states are
trying to fill in the gap in the federal law. However, according to
the report:
15 states had not established any monitoring process of SES providers
at all
25 states had not yet established any standards for evaluating
provider effectiveness
none had finalized their evaluation standards
According to the ED report, private firms accounted for 76 percent of
approved providers in May 2005. 17 states said they will evaluate
student achievement on state assessments, although only one of these
plans to use a matched control group. The most common approaches that
states have implemented to monitor providers, according to the
federal report, are surveying the districts about provider
effectiveness (25 states) and using providers’ reports on student-
level progress (18 states).
Other relevant facts as reported by ED:
The number of state-approved supplemental service providers has
tripled over the past two years, rising from 997 in May 2003 to 2,734
in May 2005.
A growing number and percentage of faith-based organizations have
obtained state approval, rising from 18 providers (2 percent of
providers) in May 2003 to 249 (9 percent) in May 2005.
---
Peter Campbell
On Jun 1, 2006, at 10:18 AM, GERALD BRACEY wrote:
I sent this to the WP the day that Hickok's oped appears. No
response save acknowledgment that they got it.
JB
----- Original Message -----
From: GERALD BRACEY
To: letters@washpost.com
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 7:45 AM
Subject: hickok
Eugene W. Hickok's essay on the tutoring available through the No
Child Left Behind law omits a few inconvenient truths.
First, he says that "those providing the service have been
certified by the state as qualified to tutor." In most cases the
certification process is a joke. There are enormous numbers of
companies that overwhelm state agencies--states, not districts,
certify provideds. Caifornia has 214 approved providers. Illinois
has 68, and only one staff person to oversee results.
Second, he is hypocritical. There is no evidence that the tutoring
works. In my paper, No Child Left Behind: Where Does the Money Go?
I pointed out while public schools are required to provide
"scientifically based evidence" for the effectiveness of any
program they wish make part of the school curriculum. The private
companies that provide most of the tutoring get a free ride. They
have no scientifically based evidence for effectiveness because
they conducted no honest research, just marketing research (as I
said, the certification process is a joke).
While the law requires "highly qualified teachers" in the schools,
it makes no such demands on the tutors. They can have any level of
education.
Once again, a Bush administration program assumes that as soon as
money leaves the public sector for the private sector (up to $2
billion a year for the tutoring), everything will work just fine,
no accountability needed. In fact, I am surprised that the Post
accepted Hickok's essay as a legitimate op-ed. He's just lobbying
for more money for his clients.
The paper mentioned can be obtained free by putting the title into
Google.
Sincerely,
Gerald W. Bracey
1797 Duffield Lane
Alexandria, VA 22307
703-317-1716
The writer is a former Director of Research, Evaluation and Testing
for the Virginia Department and is a fellow at the Education Policy
Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University and at the High/Scope
Educational Research Foundation, Ypsilanti, Michigan.
- References:
- Fw: hickok
- From: "GERALD BRACEY" <gbracey1@verizon.net>
Post a Message to arn-l: