[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: The choice of standardized tests as an historical question



See the background in Testing in American Schools - from USDOE, early 90's. Art

-----Original Message-----
From: Dorn, Sherman <SDorn@tempest.coedu.usf.edu>
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:16:31 -0400
Subject: [arn-l] The choice of standardized tests as an historical question

Last night, I was thinking about the moment in the early- to mid-1970s when
state legislatures began experimenting with some form of accountability (as they
then termed it, perhaps borrowing from Leon Lessinger, an associate commissioner
of education in the Nixon administration). For example, Florida passed something
called an accountability act in 1971, Governor Rubin Askew talked about it in
speeches in his first term, and the legislature tried different things over the
next several years, including requiring more detailed reporting of spending
(from the fiscal metaphor of <em>accountability</em>) and choosing standardized
testing as the main measure of academic achievement.

I don't think anyone has adequately explained that choice. In the 1970s,
standardized testing was coming under fairly harsh criticism for both its
construction (claims that they were generally biased in content) and use
(especially the group administration of IQ tests frequently used as screening
devices for special education). It was in the 1970s that Congress changed the
requirements for special-education assessment. From the general criticism, I
sometimes wonder if one of the motivations for ETS's famous 1975-76
"blue-ribbon" panel analyzing the SAT decline was a subtle way of relegitimizing
the SATs. (No, I don't have time to look into ETS's archives for that.) So why
did legislatures such as Florida's choose standardized testing? Last night, my
wife gave the usual answers (it's cheaper and easier to number-crunch with
them), but that doesn't quite satisfy me as an historian, in part because those
are ahistorical claims and in part because I'm not sure where I'd find evidence
to confirm those hypotheses. (It's quite possible that legislatures enacted
these without any record of discussion.)

Any other possible answers?

Sherman Dorn
University of South Florida
http://www.shermandorn.com


________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.




Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: