[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: The choice of standardized tests as an historical question
See the background in Testing in American Schools - from USDOE, early
90's. Art
-----Original Message-----
From: Dorn, Sherman <SDorn@tempest.coedu.usf.edu>
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:16:31 -0400
Subject: [arn-l] The choice of standardized tests as an historical
question
Last night, I was thinking about the moment in the early- to
mid-1970s when
state legislatures began experimenting with some form of accountability
(as they
then termed it, perhaps borrowing from Leon Lessinger, an associate
commissioner
of education in the Nixon administration). For example, Florida passed
something
called an accountability act in 1971, Governor Rubin Askew talked about
it in
speeches in his first term, and the legislature tried different things
over the
next several years, including requiring more detailed reporting of
spending
(from the fiscal metaphor of <em>accountability</em>) and choosing
standardized
testing as the main measure of academic achievement.
I don't think anyone has adequately explained that choice. In the
1970s,
standardized testing was coming under fairly harsh criticism for both
its
construction (claims that they were generally biased in content) and
use
(especially the group administration of IQ tests frequently used as
screening
devices for special education). It was in the 1970s that Congress
changed the
requirements for special-education assessment. From the general
criticism, I
sometimes wonder if one of the motivations for ETS's famous 1975-76
"blue-ribbon" panel analyzing the SAT decline was a subtle way of
relegitimizing
the SATs. (No, I don't have time to look into ETS's archives for that.)
So why
did legislatures such as Florida's choose standardized testing? Last
night, my
wife gave the usual answers (it's cheaper and easier to number-crunch
with
them), but that doesn't quite satisfy me as an historian, in part
because those
are ahistorical claims and in part because I'm not sure where I'd find
evidence
to confirm those hypotheses. (It's quite possible that legislatures
enacted
these without any record of discussion.)
Any other possible answers?
Sherman Dorn
University of South Florida
http://www.shermandorn.com
________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email
and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
Post a Message to arn-l: