[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: descent into meaninglessness?



It's certainly comforting that people preoccupied with meaninglessness and destruction are pursuing careers in education. If that's not a picker-upper for parents and kids, I don't know what is. In any event, I guess the "radical shift" that Thompson foresaw would follow the presidency of Ronald Reagan turned out to be the presidency of first one, then another, George Bush. Oh, well, maybe Jerry will run for president. Let the sun shine in!

Art

-----Original Message-----
From: Free2teach1@aol.com
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Sent: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:08:00 EDT
Subject: Re: [arn-l] descent into meaninglessness?

I just happen to come across this passage from cultural historian William Irwin Thompson and thought it might provide a ray of hope and inspiration for what appears to be an intensifying descent into meaninglessness (and destruction) that characterizes the megalomania of current education reform policy -- it's called the "sunset effect":

Speaking of industrialization Thompson says:

It is probably no accident that Ronald Reagan has come in to invoke all the old shibboleths of the industrial mentality, precisely at the moment when they are becoming inadequate, for one often sees in history that a radical shift is often preceded by an intensification of the old. Consider warfare in the fifteenth century: right at the moment when armor becomes most elaborate, with the knight lifted on to his horse by levers and pulleys, is right at the moment when the heavily armored knight is made irrelevant through the longbow, the crossbow, and the firearms. Elsewhere I have called this kind of historical phenomenon "a sunset effect," but one can see it as a kind of supernova, an intensification of a phenomenon that does not lead to its continuation, but to its vanishing."

Here's to radical shifts and sunsets.
A nice weekend to all,

JR


In a message dated 6/9/2006 12:20:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, gbracey1@verizon.net writes:
I wonder if we're seeing the start of a trend in which test results descend into meaninglessness.

The University of Utah has decided it doesn't care if students have passed Utah's exit exam.

Principals can exercise waiver rights in Indiana if certain grade and attendance criteria are met..

Texas was denied its request on attendance and since it happened in Texas I'm sure we're all very cynical about the motivation but...Texas now excludes from NCLB reporting any kids who wasn't there by the end of October (or maybe the beginning). They wanted to exclude any kid who wasn't in the same district the previous year. No deal. But when should a school be held accountable for a transfer? This is particularly true if the transfers are from "failing" schools arriving under NCLB's choice option. I've seen no widespread documentation on this but it is clear that a couple of years ago principals in New York used the choice provision to dump their behavior and discipline problems.

Jerry




Judy Rabin

Given the existence of an idealized vision of the community, movements of protest are likely to occur within the political nation when the discrepancy between the image and the reality comes to seem intolerably wide.

-- J.H. Elliott


________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.




Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: