[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: General Observation


  • To: arn-l@interversity.org
  • Subject: Re: General Observation
  • From: ABurke5054@aol.com
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:02:36 EDT


Yup, that's the way to increase nuanced discussion, all right -- ban people
who disagree with you. And there are good precedents for that -- Nazi
Germany, Stalinist Russia, and Mao's China. See how well nuanced discussion
improved in those places?

Art

In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:21:07 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jhorn@monmouth.edu writes:

I agree. Keeping Burke around eliminates the need for any nuanced
discussion of policy, assessment, curriculum or anything else. He is a dependable
and easy foil, pinata, and shameless idiot fool all rolled into one. For those
who engage him, it offers a semblance of moving a point forward, when, in
fact, any possible movement has been blocked by an unremitting refusal to even
see the beginning point. You are right, Scott--this would be a very different
list if he were booted, a fate he has earned many times over.

Jim






Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: