[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Article from CongressNow on NCLB - mentions FEA- see below


  • To: arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, ARN-L <arn-l@interversity.org>, ARN-state <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>, NDSG <ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com>
  • Subject: Fwd: Article from CongressNow on NCLB - mentions FEA- see below
  • From: monty@fairtest.org
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:00:50 -0500
  • User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)


The expert panel on assessment released recommendations on ESEA/NCLB today. We have thus far been attacked by Sec Spellings, Ed Trust, Aspen 'Commission' - doing well. To some extent their attacks make clear the deep disageements we have about the future of education, and to some extent it suggests they cannot read or wilfully misrepresent. Below is one news article already about the event.

If you want to read the exec sum or full report, go to www.fairtest.org and click on NCLB and then alternatives; or go to www.edaccountability.org and click on reports.

Monty

----- Forwarded message from ecr@rollcall.com -----
    Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:51:43 -0400
    From: ecr@rollcall.com
Reply-To: ecr@rollcall.com
Subject: Article from CongressNow on NCLB - mentions FEA- see below
      To: monty@fairtest.org

Monty,

This article just came out - thought you should see it- below.

eric

Lawmakers, Experts Call For New Testing Methods Under No Child Left Behind

By Stephen Langel
CongressNow Staff
Thursday, June 14, 2007   3:42 PM

Lawmakers and academics are increasingly looking to change the way the federal government evaluates school performance under the No Child Left Behind Act, arguing that current testing methods are too simplistic and too sporadic to give an accurate assessment.

The Forum on Educational Accountability today issued a report, ?Assessment and Accountability for Improving Schools and Learning,? that recommends testing that is more frequent and classroom-based, as opposed to the annual standardized test used under NCLB.

A yearly test, the group said, does not give the most up-to-date assessment of performance, and the standard multiple-choice approach does not provide a realistic view of what students have learned. Instead, teachers should be allowed to evaluate students? classroom performance, the panel said.

The ?testing mentality sacrifices learning,? in that it leads educators to teach to a test rather than using a broader curriculum, said Pat Roschewski, one of the study?s authors, during a briefing today. These ?one-size-fits-all? tests also shortchange special-needs students, including those who are developmentally challenged or not native speakers of English, said Alba Ortiz, another of the study?s authors.

The group is hoping to use the report to modify NCLB as it moves toward reauthorization. Reauthorization will provide a vehicle to ?rectify flaws in the system,? Ortiz added.

NCLB, which sets federal performance standards for schools, is due to expire at the end of the year. Lawmakers are concerned that NCLB will fail to meet its goal of having all children reading at their grade level by 2014.

To achieve such changes, the panel is lobbying lawmakers in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the House Education and Labor Committee to include their recommendations in reauthorization. ?I?m sensing an interest? in these changes, Roschewski said.

The group has sent the report to various lawmakers in both committees, Monty Neill, director of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, told CongressNow. Lawmakers are ?clearly interested? in changing the law, with several members poised to introduce legislation that would establish new performance standards for state and local governments under NCLB. Neill declined to elaborate on who was offering these bills.

Initially, the group?s proposal has the support of lawmakers such as Rep. Tim Bishop (D-N.Y.), a former college provost and a member of the Education and Labor Committee. A one-time written test is too ?limiting? and provides too much of an incentive for teachers to teach to the test, Bishop said. Such an approach is inhibiting teachers from doing their jobs, he added.

A variety of groups are calling for new performance standards, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), chairman of the Education and Labor committee, told CongressNow. But he has not decided what steps the committee will take, Miller added.

Rep. Rubén Hinojosa (D-Texas), chairman of the Education and Labor subcommittee on higher education, lifelong learning and competitiveness, pledged during the briefing to circulate the report to his colleagues. The chairman also promised more money for NCLB.

While previous Congresses had underfunded the program, he said, ?there?s a new sheriff in town? now that Democrats are in the majority, he said.
Back to top

  Related GalleryWatch HotDocs

Report to the President On Issues Raised by the Virginia Tech Tragedy (PDF 434 KB)
Fact Sheet of the College Cost Reduction Act of 2007 (H.R 2669) (PDF 54.3 KB)
Legislative Text of the College Cost Reduction Act of 2007 (H.R 2669) (PDF 210 KB)
GAO Correspondence to Librarian of Congress James Billington (PDF 924 KB)
GAO Report to Chairs, House and Senate Homeland Security Committees, Rep. Bennie Thompson and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (PDF 2.06 MB)

--
Eric Richardson
Roll Call Newspaper
50 F Street, NW  Suite 700
Washington D.C.  20001
202-824-6815-direct
410-533-2078-cell
202-824-0475-fax
202-824-6800-front desk
ecr@rollcall.com
____________________________________________________________________________

The Votes Are In: In the recently released 2006-2007 E&M Opinion Leader
Survey, Congressional opinion leaders voted Roll Call No. 1 in total and
regular readership, as well as the most current and enjoyable publication.

--
Eric Richardson
Roll Call Newspaper
50 F Street, NW  Suite 700
Washington D.C.  20001
202-824-6815-direct
410-533-2078-cell
202-824-0475-fax
202-824-6800-front desk
ecr@rollcall.com
____________________________________________________________________________

The Votes Are In: In the recently released 2006-2007 E&M Opinion Leader
Survey, Congressional opinion leaders voted Roll Call No. 1 in total and
regular readership, as well as the most current and enjoyable publication.

----- End forwarded message -----



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: