[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Good NCLB Letter in Washington Post
- To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, rethinkaccountdc@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Good NCLB Letter in Washington Post
- From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:25:58 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=sTysiTR7CnzHQFJBYL2kroWUqQmK3MVKPltuyxDEH/MaSyZoXN2xKky1nn6I2Xg1; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
PUTTING "NEIGHBORHOOD" BACK IN SCHOOLS
Washington Post Letters-to-the-Editor
June 18, 2007
I read with interest Education Secretary Margaret Spelling's June 9
op-ed, "A National Test We Don't Need." Ms. Spellings was right that
states and localities are the ones that design the curriculum and pay
most of the education bills. She was also correct that states and local
school districts have historically had the primary leadership role in
public education. That's why it's so hard to understand why she keeps
promoting the No Child Left Behind law's top-down approach to education.
The law has hamstrung state and local decision making by establishing a
federal accountability system that measures and punishes students and
schools on the basis of, among other things, annual high-stakes
standardized testing. This is the wrong approach, and the groundswell of
opposition to the law -- from parents, educators and administrators
alike -- shows just how flawed it is. As Congress prepares to consider
reauthorizing No Child Left Behind, we should listen to Ms. Spellings
when she says, "Neighborhood schools deserve neighborhood leadership,
not dictates from bureaucrats thousands of miles away."
Russ Feingold
U.S. Senator (D-Wis.)
Post a Message to arn-l: