[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: grad rate falls in LA in wake of grad test



Some schools are so good that parents really want their kids to go there? Perish the thought.

Art

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Farruggio <pfarr@cal.berkeley.edu>
To: arn-l@interversity.org; arn-l@interversity.org; ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com; ARN-state@yahoogroups.com; arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: ca-resisters@interversity.org
Sent: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 9:11 pm
Subject: Re: [arn-l] grad rate falls in LA in wake of grad test

Joe, 
 

Good points. One more advantage of magnet schools is the selection
mechanism that brings in "better" students. It's usually the more
engaged, hands-on (i.e. "pushy") parents or guardians who do the
necessary networking and paperwork to get their kids enrolled in
these out-of-the-neighborhood schools. A de facto creaming effect. 
 

Pete Farruggio 
 


At 05:32 PM 6/24/2008, MONICALUCIDO@comcast.net wrote: 

Just looking at the policy brief on this, I notice several things: 

 

1) It clearly says that "student mobility matters". Only ONE THIRD
of students who changed schools relative to the transition into high
school ended up graduating. So who's responsible for this? :
primarily parents. Not teachers. It IS a socio-economic issue in
many cases that causes this issue. 

 

2)It clearly says that absences affect student success. The chances
of graduating for students dropped to "less than half" for kids who
were absent for more than ten days in 7th, 8th, or high school. So
who's responsible for that? primarily parents. Not teachers. Once
again these are huge OUTSIDE factors that have impact on success or
failure. 

 

3) It clearly says that magnet schools matter. Ok, so what makes a
magnet school special? The fact that they focus on special areas of
learning that may stimulate the creative portions of the brain,
lower anxiety, and encourage kids to think critically about lessons.
This is not rocket science. The kids ENJOY this kind of teaching
because it's fun, even though it's challenging. They are more free
from continual, nauseating foci on "lecturing"/testing practice and
more focused on the kids' spirit and interest. They probably have
better teachers because those teachers also enjoy teaching
creatively and have autonomy, and thus many have decided to
challenge for a few highly sought positions. More experienced
teachers are probably more likely to get those spots. They are
TRUSTED, if you will. 

 

4) It clearly says that "social" needs need to be met BEFORE high
school and even continued DURING that time period. More counselors
to help, anyone? Also, "school level conditions" need to be
addressed as far as resources are concerned. So, maybe nice hallways
and less than, oh, I don't know, FIFTY students in a class might be
encouraging. 

 

I don't find anything fascinating about this report, except that its
just more evidence of what teachers already know: get your kids to
school on time, don't move around so much (easier said than done,
admittedly), provide adequate funding so that ALL schools can expand
their programs to accommodate ALL students, and allow teachers to
have fun teaching uniquely in the classroom. Then our kids will stay
in school and WANT to be there. Duh. 

 

Joseph Lucido 

Educators and Parents Against Test Abuse/CalCARE 

Fresno, CA 

-------------- Original message ---------------------- 

From: "Monty Neill" <monty@fairtest.org> 

> The CA graduation test is clearly implicated in the absolute as
well as relative 

> decline in the number of graduates in LA. This occurred before this
year's 

> requirement that students with disabilities must pass the exam -
a barrier that 

> no doubt will substantially increase the non-graduation rate. Monty 



>

http://www.latimes.com/news/education/la-me-grads21-2008jun21,0,3489530.story ;



> From the Los Angeles Times 

> Graduation rates declining in L.A. Unified despite higher
enrollment, study 

> finds 

> Experts say the exit exam is having a huge effect on dropouts.
The UC-led report 

> showed that middle school experiences and teacher quality were also
major 

> factors. 

> By Mitchell Landsberg 

> Los Angeles Times Staff Writer 



> June 21, 2008 



> The number of students graduating from Los Angeles public schools
has declined 

> for two straight years even as enrollment in the 12th grade has
been rising 

> sharply, new state data show. The graduation slump began when
California started 

> requiring students to pass an exit exam before they could receive
a diploma. 



> The data caught educators by surprise after they were quietly
posted on the 

> state Department of Education website. Separately, new research
released this 

> week indicated that only 48% of students in the Los Angeles Unified
School 

> District graduate on time. 



> The latest figures are sure to stir new concerns about the ability
of Los 

> Angeles schools to serve the needs of the majority of their
students, and revive 

> a debate about the wisdom of mandating an exit exam, even one
that has been 

> described as requiring only about an eighth-grade education to
pass. 



> The Los Angeles Unified School District officially declared a 64%
graduation 

> rate in 2005-06, the most recent year for which a rate is
available. District 

> leaders have long disputed studies that have shown the rate to be
under 50%. 



> But district officials did not reject the findings of the latest
study, released 

> Thursday by the California Dropout Research Project at UC Santa
Barbara. Perhaps 

> the most in-depth study ever done of Los Angeles dropouts, it
examined 

> individual student transcripts for the class that began ninth
grade in September 

> 2001 and should have graduated in June 2005. 



> "It's a good methodology," said Esther Wong, L.A. Unified's
assistant 

> superintendent for planning, assessment and research, who
reviewed a draft of 

> the study. "It's certainly better than trying to calculate it and
do a best 

> estimate." 



> Wong did question whether the study might have understated the
graduation rate 

> by not accounting for students who transferred to other
districts. But Jeannie 

> Oakes, a professor of education at UCLA who oversaw the research,
said such 

> students were removed from the count of incoming ninth-graders,
so they could 

> not have tainted the findings. 



> The study concluded that the low graduation rate for L.A. Unified
can be 

> explained in large measure by the quality of students' middle
school experience 

> and the quality of teachers at their high schools. 



> "We've learned from this that middle school is just hugely
important," said 

> Oakes, who runs UCLA's Institute for Democracy, Education &
Access. Although the 

> dropout project is based at UC Santa Barbara, it relies on
researchers at 

> several institutions, and the study was conducted at UCLA. 



> The study found that differences among schools -- for instance,
the percentage 

> of highly qualified teachers, the percentage of English learners
and the status 

> of the school as a magnet -- played a stronger role in predicting
whether a 

> student would graduate than "student factors," such as race and
socioeconomic 

> status. 



> Magnet schools had a major effect on success. Nearly three-quarters
of the 

> students attending an L.A. Unified magnet high school graduated on
time, 

> compared with just 45% of those who didn't. Magnet schools
typically offer 

> specialized, theme-based instruction and were mandated by a court
order to 

> attract students of different races. 



> The dropout study and the recently released state data foreshadow
the release of 

> new and potentially explosive statistics on the state dropout
rate that are 

> expected in mid-July. Because California has begun assigning new,
statewide 

> identification numbers to all public-school students, the dropout
data are 

> expected to be far more accurate than in the past, when there was
near-universal 

> acknowledgment that the numbers vastly understated the problem. 



> Statewide, 12th-grade enrollment has been rising for several
years, the result 

> of a baby boomlet in the late 1980s. Meanwhile, the number of high
school 

> graduates has stayed stagnant. 



> In Los Angeles Unified, the rise in enrollment has been steeper
than for the 

> state overall, yet the number of graduates declined from 29,744 in
2005 to 

> 27,438 in 2007. 



> The high school exit exam, often referred to by its acronym,
CAHSEE, became a 

> requirement for a diploma beginning with seniors who graduated in
2006. State 

> and local officials widely agreed that it was the most likely cause
for a 

> decline in graduates. 



> "I can't think of any other reason," said Keric Ashley, director of
data 

> management for the California Department of Education. "The
CAHSEE does have 

> some impact, not as much as some people thought it would." 



> John Rogers, a UCLA professor who has studied the exit exam's
effect on 

> graduation rates, said he believes the state has downplayed its
impact. The exam 

> will hit the class of 2008 especially hard, he said, because for
the first time, 

> special education students had to pass the test. 



> "In 2008, far fewer students will graduate than probably any year
over the last 

> 25 years," Rogers said. 



> Figures for 2008 graduates aren't expected until next spring. 



> Debra Duardo, the director of dropout prevention and recovery for
Los Angeles 

> Unified, said there were no surprises in the new data, and the
dropout project 

> study confirmed what district officials have assumed about the
barriers that 

> keep students from graduating. 



> For instance, as others have done previously, the researchers
pointed to algebra 

> as a tripwire for many students. 



> Seventy percent of students who passed Algebra 1 by the end of
ninth grade went 

> on to graduate on time. 



> But the majority of students did not pass it in eighth or ninth
grades, and 

> roughly two-thirds of them failed to graduate on time. 



> The study found that students who changed schools during either
middle or high 

> school had much lower graduation rates, including students who
switched between 

> the sixth and seventh grades. 



> Duardo said the district is responding to those problems. 



> She also said the study overlooked the district's recent success
in keeping 

> students in school, and on track to graduate, after they miss their
normal 

> graduation date. 



> "If they don't do it in four years, maybe they can do it in five
years," she 

> said. 



> mitchell.landsberg@ latimes.com 

> Monty Neill, Ed.D. 

> Deputy Director 

> FairTest 

> 342 Broadway 

> Cambridge, MA 02139 

> 617-864-4810 x 101; fax 617-497-2224 

> monty@fairtest.org 

> http://www.fairtest.org ;

> Donate: 

>

https://secure.entango.com/servlet/donate/MnrXjT8MQqk--------------------------- ;

> ---------------------------- 

> Subscribe ARN-L: 

> http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/subscribe.html ;
 








Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: