[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: March 27, 1996 Ed Week
- Subject: Re: March 27, 1996 Ed Week
- From: gerald bracey <gbracey@EROLS.COM>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:56:15 -0500
- Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
- Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
Ed week archives are at www.edweek.org and it's easy to find articles.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabie Gedlaman - AZ Standards" <gabieg@AZSTANDARDS.ORG>
To: <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 6:16 PM
Subject: March 27, 1996 Ed Week
> I'd be interested in a copy of this article if someone still keeps a 1996
Ed
> Week.
>
> Gabie Gedlaman
> gabieg@azstandards.org
> *******************************
> WHAT'S WRONG WITH 'HIGH STAKES TESTS' AND THE 'AIMS' TEST IN PARTICULAR?
> www.azstandards.org
> azstandards-subscribe@egroups.com
>
> From: Gaylynn Becker
> 5. Michael H. Keen, Vice President for Public and Governmental
Affairs,
> CTB/McGraw-Hill, Monterey, California had an article titled "Test
Publishers
> Support 'Multiple Measures' Approach." This article appeared on page 46
of
> the March 27, 1996 edition of Education Week. With Mr. Kean's permission,
I
> have included this article in each annual Test Interpretation Workshop
> Booklet since 1996 and I have attributed it to Mr. Kean.
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
Post a Message to arn-l: