[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Kurt Landgraf
- Subject: Kurt Landgraf
- From: kber <kber@EARTHLINK.NET>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:13:49 -0500
- Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
- Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
has put out a piece of which readers of this list should be aware.
Jimmy Kilpatrick posted it today, as part of his In Defense of Testing
series on EducationNews.org
Ken Bernstein
ducation Reform:
Measuring Success
By Kurt M. Landgraf, President & CEO
of Educational Testing Service
The passage of the No Child Left Behind Act was a watershed event in
the national education reform movement. The President and Members
of Congress pulled together to make this happen without regard to
party affiliation, recognizing the public's demand that educating all
our
children is the nation’s top priority. However, far-reaching
reform will not come easily. We must now focus on three critical
factors that will determine success: a substantial commitment of
resources, sufficient time, and a great and sustained effort.
As we all know, circumstances have changed since this historic
legislation was first introduced. We face a new reality in the post 9-11
world. Attention has been placed, and rightly so, on security both at
home and around the globe. And the go-go economy of the past decade
has slowed. Shrinking budgets are forcing tough decisions by elected
officials at the state and local levels, and by everyday Americans
sitting
around their kitchen tables.
Yet the desire for meaningful education reform persists. An Opinion
Dynamics survey conducted for ETS in mid-February found that
Americans overwhelmingly back requiring states to annually test
students to determine if standards are being met. A majority of those
surveyed also support directing a larger share of federal education
money to schools that do not perform well on such tests to help them
improve.
While considerable federal funds have been made available for these
new tests, significant resources will have to come from the state level
as
well. Even as most state legislatures struggle to split up a smaller
pool
of tax revenue, we must ensure that they invest in building quality
assessments to support good teaching and learning.
It is now time for all of us — parents, students, teachers and
policymakers — to follow through on our commitment to
advancing quality and equity in education.
The No Child Left Behind Act calls for high standards, strong
accountability, and annual standards-based assessments. Federal
mandates now require testing some 22 million students every year. This
is an ambitious undertaking, and it has to be done right. But developing
a fair, accurate test, even in just one subject for one grade, is a
lengthy,
multi-step process. The specter of unreliable data and costly mistakes
assures us that we must invest the time and money it takes to get it
right
the first time.
The new testing regimen will provide important information that the
American people and policymakers can use to accomplish significant,
lasting reform. But testing alone is not enough; it’s just one
step
in education reform. We must respond to test results —
particularly poor results — intelligently, thoughtfully, and
responsibly in order to help teachers and students improve classroom
achievement. The challenge before us is to muster the political, moral
and professional will to improve public education. We must provide the
resources to help teachers teach and help students learn, and we must
monitor progress via well-designed assessments. Only then will we be
able to reach our goal: an education system marked by excellence in
student performance, elimination of the achievement gap, and, yes,
tangible evidence that no child is left behind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
Post a Message to arn-l: