[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: PACE explores accountability policy impacts on
At 05:26 AM 3/2/2004 -0800, Peter Farruggio wrote:
From PACE (notice there is no comment on the validity of the standardized
tests)...
Some of this stuff is what George Schmidt calls "Unicorn Studies." If you
don't question the underlying assumptions, you can do all kinds of
interesting research on the epiphenomena.
Still, the PACE report does point out some negative consequences of the
high-stakes accountability system, including the fact that testing and test
preparation are displacing other instructional activities. The quote from a
teacher included in their press release is pretty significant: "The things
that cause children to love school and learn on their own are being cut
out." So is the teacher comment about the amount of time wasted in testing
instead of learning.
I haven't been able to find the full report, the joint policy brief, or the
reports from the other research organizations online. I've been waiting for
these, because I heard a month ago that they were going to report that the
II/USP (Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program) was a failure.
PACE explores accountability policy impacts on educators
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/02/26_pace.shtml
By Kathleen Maclay, Media Relations | 26 February 2004
BERKELEY California's educators appreciate state efforts to improve
student achievement and low-performing schools, but are frustrated by a
lack of support and teaching resources for addressing achievement gaps,
according to a new report and joint policy brief.
Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE), a policy research center
at the University of California, Berkeley, UC Davis and Stanford
University, is presenting its research findings about the impacts of
public school accountability policies today (Thursday, Feb. 26) at a news
conference in Sacramento.
Joining PACE to present additional data on school accountability reform in
California will be the American Institutes for Research and the Consortium
for Policy Research in Education. These three independent research
organizations will release a joint policy brief, discussing overlapping
findings and recommendations.
...
PACE and the two other organizations investigating these issues have found
that, while the policies are producing benefits, they also are having
unintended, negative consequences.
For example, testing and test preparation are displacing other
instructional activities. "There's so much that they expect you to do that
it's science that doesn't get taught, art doesn't get taught," a teacher
is quoted as saying in the PACE study. "The things that cause children to
love school and learn on their own are being cut out."
Another teacher interviewed estimated that a month of each school year is
spent in testing. "And our kids are in school for only eight months. So
what is that? Twelve percent? And that is a long time that you cannot
really be teaching them..."
Given teachers' time constraints, the PACE report says it is not
surprising that they focus on teaching the subjects that form the basis
for evaluating student, teacher and school performance.
The study also found another shortcoming of the state system: Annual
testing is done late in the school year, with results unavailable until
late summer. The delay prevents teachers from using those test scores to
inform and modify instruction during the school year, it said.
George Sheridan
Northside School
Cool, California 95614
Post a Message to arn-l: