[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Sailing merrily along while our schools sink
- To: arn-l@interversity.org
- Subject: Sailing merrily along while our schools sink
- From: Carol Holst <kceh@airmail.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:55:08 -0600
- Cc: taasblue@yahoogroups.com
Molly Ivins
Sailing merrily along while our schools sink
SYNDICATED COLUMNIST
Friday, March 12, 2004
Gosh, we are having such a swell time here in Texas. For starters, once
again the speaker of the Texas House is under investigation by a grand
jury. We're so proud. We have nothing against this guy personally, we're
just rooting for an indictment as a matter of Texas tradition. This
would make five out of the last six House speakers indicted for one
thing or another, and you must admit, that's some record.
(As a matter of strict accuracy, I should note that there was one
speaker in there who was not indicted, but rather was shot to death by
his wife. However, she was indicted -- although not convicted.)
Also adding to the je ne sais quoi at the old corral is our only
governor, Cap'n Goodhair Perry. Cap'n Goodhair, who is from Haskell and
went to school at College Station -- both decidedly landlocked -- has
shown an unexpectedly nautical flair of late. Combining his hitherto
unknown passion for the briny deep with the exigencies of the school
funding crisis, Cap'n Rick decided the thorny problem could best be
resolved at sea. He decided to hold a seminar on school finance at
Abaco, in the Bahamas, aboard a 54-foot yacht.
This "working retreat" over President's Day weekend was paid for by the
governor's campaign and "private donations." Abaco is also noted for
great bonefishing. Speaker Tom Craddick, who was unable to go because of
recent neck surgery, didn't get the word about the "working" part, and
his spokesman said: "He didn't feel like scuba diving with a neck brace.
There isn't anything he could have done with that neck brace." Such as,
for instance, discuss school financing.
Scouring the nation for the finest financial minds of his generation to
go along on the retreat, Cap'n Goodhair took two major donors, James
Leininger and James Nau, with wives, and Grover Norquist, the anti-tax
nut from Washington. And there they sailed on the good ship "Voucher
Plan."
Actually, I just made up the boat's name, but it seems apt, since
Leininger is a passionate advocate of school vouchers and has given
literally millions to state candidates in hopes of getting them to vote
for that very thing. Brooke Rollins, head of the extremely right-wing
Texas Public Policy Foundation, largely funded by Leininger, was also
along.
Norquist is just the sailor you want in the crew when contemplating the
disaster about to engulf the public schools. He is behind the national
anti-tax movement, and 38 Texas Republican legislators have now signed
his pledge to never, ever raise taxes, without exceptions, including for
catastrophic emergencies. Norquist himself is a noted contributor to the
sweet science of state governance, saying last year: "We are trying to
change the tones in the state capitols and turn them toward bitter
nastiness and partisanship. . . . Bipartisanship is just another name
for date rape."
Now, I don't want to be alarmist, but there is a new study out called
"Voucher Veneer: the Deeper Agenda to Privatize Public Education" by
People for the American Way. Unfortunately, all the authors had to do
was read think-tank papers and policy proposals normally circulated only
among the right wing to notice that vouchers are simply a stalking
horse. Not that it takes a lot of insight to realize that a plan
consisting of, "Let's take a lot of the tax money that goes to public
schools and give it to private schools, instead," is not a plan designed
to help public education.
Texas is the National Laboratory for Bad Government, and think what a
splendid opportunity we now have to completely ruin our public schools
by doing absolutely nothing. Our schools are funded by the Robin Hood
plan adopted in 1993, which arrives at an approximate level of fairness
between rich and poor districts by taking money from rich districts and
giving them to poor ones.
Local property taxes have skyrocketed, while state lawmakers
complacently brag they haven't raised taxes. The state's share of the
cost of public education has dropped from 52 percent in 1980 to 38
percent today. The state, which has an infinitely larger tax base than
local districts, may not have raised state taxes, but they have sure as
a by-God raised your local taxes.
This cannot continue. More than half of the school districts are already
within 1 percent of the top tax rate allowed by state law. They can
raise local taxes no further. They are cutting programs and firing
teachers and administrators. More and more are applying for waivers to
get their districts exempted from the state requirements that there be
no more than 22 pupils per teacher in the first elementary grades, and
that was the great triumph of years of school reform efforts. As we have
all learned over the long struggle to improve the schools, smaller class
size is the one improvement we know works no mater what the other
variables are.
We need at least $10 billion in new taxes to fix this without harming
the schools. The alternative is a $2 billion fix patch on the old system
that will further decay the schools. So, attention all Americans, the
case study being right here in Texas, home of so much bad public policy:
how to destroy the public schools.
Ivins is based in Austin.
Find this article at:
http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/auto/epaper/editions/friday/editorial_0415e67653840072008f.
html
Carol's Crabby Comments-
I disagree with the $10 billion statement. For one, we could dispense
with the expensive and bogus school testing program. We could also shift
the "accountability" monkey from the backs of kids to those who waste
public money.
But I do agree that vouchers are not only a stalking horse for public
schools but a trojan horse for those choosing private alternatives. Does
anybody really believe that there will be no strings attached to a wad
of cash received after completing what will probably be gobs of
paperwork?
If you think resistance is expensive, try compliance with No Child Left
Behind.
Post a Message to arn-l: