[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Excerpts from alleged 5th grade math anti-textbook


  • To: arn-l@interversity.org
  • Subject: Re: Excerpts from alleged 5th grade math anti-textbook
  • From: arthurhu@comcast.net
  • Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:40:04 +0000

It just galls me that sane, polite people don't have the guts
to stand up and say "this is just plain stupid". Sigh.
> I don't have to agree or disagree with any particular textbook; range,
> median, mode, and mean are part of my state's curriculum, and it is mandated
> that I teach them. Whether I agree with it or not. If it is not in the
> book I'm currently using, I do it anyway. It doesn't have to show up in a
> book to show up in the classroom.
>
> I don't remember what grade I learned "average" in. I know I already knew
> it when I ran into it in college; range, median, mode, and mean were all
> reviewed and used in my psychological measurement class.
>
> I also don't think what age we learn things at is the issue; I don't really
> think that there is any one "age" that everybody should learn a particular
> thing. Some are ready to learn sooner, some later. It just matters that
> they learn. Obsessing over what "age" or what "grade level" every isolated
> skill should be mastered is part of the current lock-step, one-size-fits-all
> obsession about how to structure curriculum. I'd rather go in a different
> direction, and focus on making sure that every individual, no matter where
> they happen to be with their learning at any age, has access to
> opportunities to learn whatever they are ready for, and to go as far as they
> are ready and able to do.
>
> Kelley
>
> "We must be the change we wish to see in the world."
> -Gandhi
>
> > So you do disagree with Dale Seymour Investigations that
> > that average should not be taught to 5th graders, and that
> > 6th graders shouldn't even be expected to know or be exposed
> > to the standard method? Do you think a college statistics textbook
> > should cover average, and its standard method, since research
> > shows "adults can't even grasp this concept?"
> >
> > Does everybody in this group believe that's its' harmful to teach average
> > or the standard method, or include it in state standards, since every
> > state standard specifies average at 4th grade, and every math textbook
> > ever written except the NCTM based books includes it at the 4th grade
> > level?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> ARN-L archives:
> http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives.html



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: