[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FCARFORUM] FCAT Scoring in Temps' Hands


  • To: arn-l@interversity.org
  • Subject: Re: [FCARFORUM] FCAT Scoring in Temps' Hands
  • From: George Sheridan <learn@jps.net>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:40:25 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <s4149842.004@gwise.louisville.edu>

At 09:52 PM 3/12/2006 -0500, George K Cunningham wrote:
This is why large-scale tests should be multiple-choice format only.

Correction: Multiple choice tests are the only ones that avoid certain types of scoring error that result from biases or inadequate training of scorers. However, when there are no high stakes attached to them, large scale assessments may very well utilize essays and constructed responses. As Scott Hays pointed out on March 10, such assessments can have other significant benefits (such as the professional development and networking opportunities they provide for teachers) that outweigh possible scoring inaccuracies. Multiple choice tests lack these benefits. In fact, they are widely perceived (by students, parents and teachers) as causing collateral damage such as curriculum narrowing and instilling a false understanding of the very meaning of education.

Thus George Cunningham's statement, if it is true at all, is true only in the context of high stakes testing.


George Sheridan
Black Oak Mine Teachers Association, CTA/NEA
Garden Valley, California

"Intelligence, in short, is not a thing but a behavior. It is not something we possess but something we do."

- Evans Clinchy



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: