[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [eddra] [ HuffingtonPost.com ] Recommendation: The Zero Percent Ch ance of 100 Percent Success
- To: monty@fairtest.org
- Subject: Re: [eddra] [ HuffingtonPost.com ] Recommendation: The Zero Percent Ch ance of 100 Percent Success
- From: "dwilmer@netzero.net" <dwilmer@netzero.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:10:58 GMT
- Cc: arn-l@interversity.org, arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com, eddra@yahoogroups.com
"...And what ways of phrasing this issue will they hear and
understand, positively react to. The more such folks we win over, the
easier it is to win the battle over whether NCLB is or is not
a "civil rights" law.
Monty Neill
FairTest"
I'm not sure if this is way out in left field, but how about focusing
their attention on the "funding gap." It was my impression that ESEA
was initially passed in order to help poor/minority schools out
financially, and I even recall reading that desegregating schools was
a requirement for receiving Title I funds. Perhaps an amendment to
NCLB could require states to develop funding schemes that, at the
very least, equalize funding between rich and poor districts, and at
best weight funding so that poor districts get proportionally more
money to meet the higher needs of poor children.
Certainly civil rights advocates can get behind that.