"Why MCT's? 2nd Try,"

[Richard Hake <rrhake@earthlink.net>]

In my ARN-L post of 07 Mar 2007  titled "Why MCT's? 2nd Try" [Hake 
(2007)] I wrote:

"I transmitted this post to ARN-L on 6 February 2006 . . .[I should 
have written 2007!]. . . . But the Feb 2007 ARN-L archives at 
<http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Feb2007_date/index.html> 
indicate that no posts appeared on the archives after 5 Feb.

To which George Sheridan (2007) replied on 07 Mar 2007:

"The original message was posted at 5:49 PM on February 6. There were 
three replies on February 8. "

For those like myself who monitor ARN-L posts on the archives, there 
are no ARN-L posts on the February ARN-L after 5 February 2007.  So 
neither my  original post  of 6 Feb 2007 or the two replies of 8 
February appear on the ARN-L February archives at 
<http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Feb2007_date/index.html>. 
At the heading of that archive appears the statement "Last updated: 
Mon Feb 05 19:14:05 2007."

I wonder if it might be possible to place ARN-L posts between 6 and 
28 February 2007 on the February 2007 archives?

BTW: I also subscribe to the ARN-L Digest, but the last Digest I 
received was Vol. 3 No. 374 with 6 messages, all dated 7 February 
2007.


Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
<rrhake@earthlink.net>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi>


REFERENCES
Hake, R.R. 2007. "Why MCT's? 2nd Try," ARN-L post of 7 Mar 2007 
21:44:07-0800; online at 
<http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Mar2007/msg00033.html>.

Sheridan, G. 2007. "Re: Why MCT's? 2nd Try." ARN-L post of 07 Mar 
2007 22:40:52-0800; online at 
<http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives/Mar2007/msg00034.html>