[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Fw: Why not let kids be kids?
- To: arn-l@interversity.org
- Subject: Re: Fw: Why not let kids be kids?
- From: QCao009@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:15:12 EDT
In a message dated 3/18/2008 10:41:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
monty@fairtest.org writes:
We're born "ready" to learn. I hate that "angst" as Jay Featherstone
refers to it. If that's what it takes to get PreK maybe we should do
without it for a while longer. Children need safey, nurturing places
with lots of "stuff" to play with, folks to read to them, sing to
them, dance with them, etc. The rest is dangerous to their health and
welfare.
Thanks, Deb and Monty. We talked on this list about exiting agrarian
thinking. It's time we discuss moving beyond industrialized thinking...
functioning less like robots. When we were studying open vs close culture, a
discussion Hall and Mead started a while back, we were not ready to make the
connection between freedom of religion and freedom. After the last twenty years of US
regression after the fall of USSR, we may want to redefine an equal
education opportunity and not let standards supporters further continue the
conformity push in the world. May be China, cars and coke can tell us something about
how we can think differently about education now if we are to truly have a
global economy.
Quan
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (
http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
Post a Message to arn-l: