[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Why not let kids be kids?
The mom who said that she was grateful that NCLB came along and made
her child's school hold higher expectations for him made a lot more
sense than Nel.
Art
-----Original Message-----
From: Horace B Lucido <hbl04@csufresno.edu>
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Sent: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 4:06 pm
Subject: Re: [arn-l] Why not let kids be kids?
Peter,
Thanks for the link, but the last portion was not hyperllinked:
http://ed.stanford.edu/suse/news-bureau/displayRecord.php?tablename=susenews&id=259
Rog
Rog ( Horace ) Lucido, Physics Instructor, Ret.
Program Evaluator
Adjunct Faculty, Fresno Pacific University
Educational Consultant
Educators and Parents Against Testing Abuse ( EPATA )
Assessment Reform Network Central Valley Coordinator
Phone: 559-277-1312
Cell: 559-355-4215
email: lucid4@cvip.net
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Campbell <campbellp@mail.montclair.edu>
Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:49 am
Subject: Re: [arn-l] Why not let kids be kids?
To: arn-l@interversity.org
Cc: Deborah Meier <deborah.meier@gmail.com>, Jay Featherstone
<josfe@msu.edu>
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Peter Campbell wrote:
>
>
> Nel Noddings -- professor of education, emerita, at Stanford and
> now at TC Columbia -- had a great piece in Ed Week that is re-
> published here. Her insights might help.
The link is:
http://ed.stanford.edu/suse/news-bureau/displayRecord.php?
tablename=susenews&id=259
-------------------------------------------------------
ARN-L archives:
http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/archives.html
Post a Message to arn-l: