[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Virginia Legislature Adopts Bill Allowing NCLB Opt-Out
- To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Virginia Legislature Adopts Bill Allowing NCLB Opt-Out
- From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:33:44 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=HPRdT/fwiX1ZMLHwqq/okzNAz0quQcn3AquZc+W4zJByXok4j9FPhF0X51zeQ/mO; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL TO ALLOW "NO CHILD" OPT-OUT
Washington Post -- March 9, 2008
Richmond -- Virginia's Board of Education would be directed to recommend
whether the state should pull out of a federal school accountability
system under legislation that cleared the General Assembly Saturday. It
now awaits consideration by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D).
Virginia is among several states in which officials have argued that the
federal government has failed to provide enough funding and flexibility
to carry out the No Child Left Behind law, which requires annual testing
in math and reading for many children.
The measure that passed the House on Friday and the Senate on Saturday
would not have an immediate impact. If the Board of Education recommends
withdrawal from the federal accountability system, the bill would
require the board to present a plan to the governor and legislature by
June 30, 2009.
Congress is considering whether to amend the 6-year-old federal law.
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) has said he plans to introduce a bill
this spring.
The federal law requires annual testing in grades three through eight
and once in high school. Schools and school systems must show annual
progress, and the results must include scores for subgroups of students
such as ethnic minorities, disabled students and those with limited
English skills.
The law has been credited with revealing pockets of struggling students.
But states and localities have complained they are stuck with too much
of the cost. Some also argue that the law is too rigid.
In January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit revived a
lawsuit by the National Education Association and several school systems
that challenged the law as an unfunded mandate. The U.S. Education
Department is appealing.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/08/AR2008030802333_pf.html
Post a Message to arn-l: