[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Model Local Testing Op. Ed.


  • To: ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>
  • Subject: Model Local Testing Op. Ed.
  • From: Bob Schaeffer <bobschaeffer@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:19:31 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=bwMFinjSsWSrxaw7fv+UrutORKnKdFV/CofC867oibSxkwu4ws9YhGRgmyfaSnox; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

A very good job covering both local and national testing issues in easy-to-understand language

IT'S TIME TO SCRAP THE CSAP
Fort Collins Now Op. Ed. -- March 11, 2008
by Eric Fried

Last week my children came home with the annual notice about their school's upcoming Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) tests, which steal valuable time from actual learning over many weeks. The most galling part is the recommendation that my kids get a good night's sleep and eat a good breakfast, so they can perform well on the tests. Since we don't get a notice to send them to school rested and well fed on normal school days, school administrators are telling us that testing matters more than learning.

Although the CSAP's predate the federal No Child Left Behind law, they've been folded into that wrong-headed national regimen of “teaching to the test” in the name of accountability. These standardized tests don't actually test students (we have plenty of better tests for that), they test their schools, and the penalty for failure can be institutional death. Therefore, nothing is more important to schools than doing well on CSAP's, and if frills like recess, foreign languages, art and music have to be kicked to the curb to allow more time for test prep, so be it.

What's wrong with CSAP's? Let me count the ways:

- This one-size-fits-all unfunded federal mandate focuses on rote memorization, superficial knowledge, and test-taking skills, rather than concept integration, reasoning strategies, and critical thinking. Is this really what we want the next generation to learn in this complex, changing world?

- Standardized test results are closely linked to socioeconomic factors. The bigger the parents' homes, the higher the scores. The more kids getting free school lunches, and the more with language barriers, the lower the scores. Poor kids going to underfunded schools do worse, but instead of their schools being helped with more resources, their schools face closure if low scores continue.

- CSAP and similar tests are not improving student performance, according to the National Center for Fair and Open Testing. However, the soul-deadening effects of these tests is driving more teachers from the profession and increasing student dropout rates.

No wonder a 2007 Gallup poll shows only one in four Americans believe No Child Left Behind is helping their schools, while the rest feel it is either hurting or has no effect. More states, school districts and congressional reps are demanding an end to (or major reform of) this law.

There's good reason for this growing skepticism: No Child Left Behind's real agenda was never to help, but to destroy public schools. Failing schools can have their plug pulled and converted to charter schools, with great political impetus given to the movement for school vouchers. Vouchers will help dissolve the great social glue of our democratic system—the unifying idea of free public education for all—and open the door for direct tax subsidies to religious and private schools, thereby demolishing the wall separating church and state and turning education into a marketable commodity.

Who has benefited from this bait-and-switch law? Consider the case of McGraw-Hill, publisher of textbooks and test materials, including the CSAPs. Their company profits were $49 million in 1993 (before CSAP's), but soared to over $300 million in one decade. CEO Harold McGraw III bragged, “Today's reform movement has been propelled from the beginning by powerful political and economic interests.” Another winner in the high-stakes curriculum/testing landscape is the much smaller Ignite! Learning, whose hyper-expensive Curriculum on Wheels (COW) modules do not meet rigorous Congressional standards, but are spreading nationwide nonetheless. I'm sure it's purely coincidental that Ignite! is run by First Brother Neil Bush, last seen looting Colorado taxpayers of $1.6 billion in the Silverado Savings and Loan scandal.

Help stop this madness. Call your Congresswoman. Go to the Coalition for Better Education Web site at www.thecbe.org <http://www.thecbe.org> to download a CSAP opt-out form, and give it to your child's teacher or principal. Our children are unique, creative creatures, not McNuggets, and they need to be inspired, not standardized.

Eric Fried is peeling the UPC labels off his children's heads at eric@pvgreens.org <mailto:eric@pvgreens.org>

http://www.fortcollinsnow.com/article/20080311/GUEST/106173654



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: