[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
SAT scores down this year
- To: ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>, ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>
- Subject: SAT scores down this year
- From: Peter Campbell <campbellp@mail.montclair.edu>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:45:19 -0500
New SAT Mystery
The College Board is trying to figure out why many colleges are
experiencing declines in their average SAT scores this year.
In a memo to admissions officers, the board said that it believed
that there was a four-to-five point decline, on average, comparing
scores this year to last, excluding the new writing test. A “small
additional decline” may be evident when all scores for the year are
compiled. Based on the size of the decline, colleges should feel that
it is “valid” to compare students’ scores on this year’s exam to
those from previous years, the memo said.
But many colleges are reporting larger declines — in the range of
10-20 points. And several admissions officers said that they were
concerned because other measures of applicant quality — class rank or
courses students take in high school — were either holding steady or
improving. Typically, admissions officers said, such measures and SAT
average scores would rise and fall together. And the College Board
had assured colleges repeatedly prior to the changes in the SAT over
the last year that score comparability would not be hurt.
“It’s certainly curious and unusual,” said Stephen Farmer, director
of undergraduate admissions at the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, where the average SAT score is down 12 points this year
— while all other measures of applicant quality are up. Farmer said
that officials of the College Board have been “very diligent” in
working to try to figure out why scores dropped and what it means.
Similar declines have been reported systemwide at the University of
California, which has not seen declines in measures of quality aside
from SAT scores.
Privately, some admissions officials were less charitable than Farmer
is, noting that they were hearing from colleague after colleague
about larger drops than the College Board was reporting. For the
College Board, any new concern about the SAT couldn’t come at a worse
time. The board has been facing criticism, ridicule and at least one
lawsuit for scoring errors on the October 2005 SAT, and for a series
of announcements in which the acknowledged extent of the scoring
errors grew.
On Tuesday, Gaston Caperton, president of the board, was defending
its procedures at a New York State Senate hearing called over
concerns about the accuracy of scores. Caperton’s testimony did not
mention the latest concerns.
In its memo to admissions officers, the College Board said that the
declines may be caused by “changing test taker patterns, including a
trend of some students taking the test less frequently.” The board
said that “we believe that this decrease in repeat test-taking may
account for some of the average score decline” because re-tests
commonly increase a score by 30 points on reading and math combined.
Farmer of Chapel Hill said that he didn’t think applicants would be
hurt because they are competing against one another.
But other admissions officials aren’t sure. Bob Voss, dean of
admission at La Salle University, in Philadelphia, said he is
concerned. His institution saw a 10 point drop. In talking to his
colleagues at other campuses, he said, “I haven’t found anyone who
thinks it’s true” that the score decline has been as small as the
College Board has said. Voss said that his applicants this year are
notably improved in class rank.
One person’s SAT score and class rank may not correlate as expected,
he said. “But you can look at 5,000 of them and it means something,”
he said. “I’m seeing scores that are just amazing to me.”
And Voss said that many colleges do make decisions based on SAT
scores. At his institution, for example, some students who are
admitted with relatively low SAT scores are encouraged to enroll in
enrichment programs. “We may have put people into that program who
didn’t need to be there,” he said.
Several admissions officials and high school guidance counselors said
that the SAT score situation has been the topic of considerable
discussion in the last week or so. Chiara Coletti, a spokeswoman for
the College Board, said via e-mail that “not a significant number of
colleges” have contacted the board about the issue. She said that
nine colleges had alerted the board to declines, and that the board
then decided to send out the memo “proactively” to admissions
officers, and that not many had since expressed concern.
Coletti said that the College Board did not plan to notify test
takers at this point of the concerns about the scoring decline, in
keeping with the board’s approach of not sharing incomplete cohort
results. Some students might find the information on the College
Board Web site, she said. It appears there under the headline “206
SAT Cohort Averages” on the portion of the site for educators.
Admissions officials said that applicants appeared unaware of the
issue. “Telling students specifically about average scores to date
for a part of their cohort wouldn’t seem to serve them,” Coletti said.
— Scott Jaschik
The original story and user comments can be viewed online at http://
insidehighered.com/news/2006/05/03/sat.
Post a Message to arn-l: