[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: cautious celebration today
- To: <arn-l@interversity.org>
- Subject: Re: cautious celebration today
- From: "Horn, James" <jhorn@monmouth.edu>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:32:14 -0500
- References: <269d402aeab1e640f9ab8152d129f5e8@mail.montclair.edu>
- Thread-index: AccDU6MV9JlcaCSPQy6TdcKbDuneFQBDAfx9
- Thread-topic: [arn-l] cautious celebration today
Peter,
Nice piece. Ready to get back to blogging?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: arn-l-owner@interversity.org on behalf of Peter Campbell
Sent: Wed 11/8/2006 11:33 AM
To: ARN Main List
Subject: [arn-l] cautious celebration today
Now that the Democrats have regained control of the House and -- at the
very least -- have increased their strength in the Senate, what effect
will this have on the upcoming reauthorization of NCLB?
Some argue, "This is a Republican, George Bush thing and will die with
the Bush administration." I've heard this one told many times by
wide-eyed Democrats/progressives. Let's not forget that NCLB was
ushered into existence with the help of key Democrats like George
Miller from CA in the House and Ted Kennedy in the Senate. So will NCLB
just go away with Dubbya? Extremely unlikely.
According to a story in today's Inside Higher Education
(
http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/11/08/congress), the chairmanship
of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce would presumably
go to the senior Democrat on the panel, Miller of California. "But news
reports Tuesday indicated that Miller might opt instead to become
chairman of the House Resources Committee, which oversees environmental
issues, hugely important in the Congressman's home state. If Miller
were to take the Resources job, the education chairmanship would
probably fall to Rep. Dale E. Kildee of Michigan, who is very popular
with college officials, and is seen as somewhat more bipartisan than
Miller."
More bipartisan than Miller? While this kind of pabulum sounds nice on
certain issues, what we do not need is more "bipartisanship" on
education. Such bipartisanship got us in the mess we are in now. What
we need is someone with a spine, who knows the issues related to public
education, and who will fight for the rights of children.
So for those of us sympathetic to progressive causes and who side --
somewhat reluctantly -- with the Democrats, let's give our perfunctory
three cheers for yesterday's victories. But let's push these
newly-elected folks on the issue of education. Let's leverage the
recent statement from the National Association of Elementary Principals
(
http://www.naesp.org/client_files/ESEA-8-06.pdf) that lays out what
the reauthorization of NCLB should look like. Let's make this victory
really mean something.
Peter
Post a Message to arn-l: