[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Big Business Going to Bat for NCLB
- To: arn-l@interversity.org, LiteracyForAll@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Big Business Going to Bat for NCLB
- From: "PRISCILLA GUTIERREZ" <pgutpgut@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:18:15 +0000
This appeared in today's edition of Education Week. Excuse me? Their
lobbying presence on education has been modest? Tell that to the folks in
MA, where the Business Roundtable was a major player at a recent educational
summit that Mitt Romney held while educators were personae non grata.
Big Business Going to Bat for NCLB
Competitiveness Is Cited as Reason to Retain Law
By David J. Hoff
Large companies and major business groups are known for hiring well-heeled
lobbyists to push for their interests, especially in such areas as tax and
spending laws. But their federal lobbying presence on education issues has
been relatively modest. Until now.
As Congress gears up to reauthorize the No Child Left Behind Act, business
groups are laying the groundwork to have their voices heard in the process.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable?two prominent
Washington-based groups representing business owners and chief executives of
large corporations, respectively?announced last month that they have formed
a coalition with other business groups to protect the nearly 5-year-old
education law from major changes.
The U.S. Chamber, the Business Roundtable, and other business organizations
are also pushing for changes in other areas of pre-K-12 education, such as
improving mathematics and science education, expanding instruction in
foreign languages and international issues, and offering preschool to all
families that want it.
Business leaders say their interest in the No Child Left Behind law and
other education matters can be summed up in one word: competitiveness.
?This is a very, very serious problem, and business takes it seriously,?
Arthur F. Ryan, the chairman and chief executive officer of Prudential
Financial Inc., a Newark, N.J.-based insurance and financial-services
company, said at a forum on the NCLB law sponsored by the Business
Roundtable in Washington last month.
Executives such as Mr. Ryan, who is chairman of the BRT?s task force on
education and workforce preparation, are actively involved in part out of
self-interest. They believe that by improving schools and student
achievement, they?ll have better employees in the future.
?Business is probably the largest consumer of American education,? said
Charles E.M. Kolb, the president for the Committee for Economic Development,
a Washington-based group of business, academic, and philanthropic leaders.
The priority is ?having people in the workforce who are capable and have the
skills you need in the workforce today,? he said.
Bigger Voice
While corporate America has long supported national education initiatives,
many observers say that business leaders are now more prominent and more
focused on specific details than ever before. Although business leaders
supported efforts to set national education goals in the late 1980s, for
example, they weren?t as involved as they are now in advocating specific
policy measures.
Before Congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, business
leaders had not been big players in reauthorizations of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act, the Great Society-era legislation that was most
recently revised by the NCLB law.
That year, the Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce formed a
coalition of 50 other business groups and individual companies to support
key elements of the legislation, which President Bush ultimately signed into
law in January 2002. The coalition worked hard to ensure that the law?s
testing requirements focused on reading and mathematics and required annual
snapshots of students? performance. Congress adopted that approach,
requiring testing in those subjects in grades 3-8 and once in high school.
The business groups also endorsed the law?s accountability measures that
require districts to take action to fix schools not meeting achievement
goals. Those interventions start with requiring districts to allow students
whose schools don?t meet yearly achievement goals to transfer to other
public schools after two consecutive years and to receive free tutoring
after three consecutive years. If problems persist, the districts must
intervene by taking over the schools.
Because the law?s testing and accountability requirements have faced
criticism from various quarters, business leaders plan to enter the
reauthorization debate and put their muscle behind keeping them in place,
said one lobbyist.
?There?s a general sense that in the business community, No Child Left
Behind was a very important step and to back away from it would be a
troubling sign, ? particularly in the face of this ramp-up [of educational
achievement] in other countries,? said Sandy Kress, who as a White House
policy aide helped President Bush negotiate with Congress over the details
of the No Child Left Behind law. He is now a lawyer based in Austin, Texas.
The U.S. Chamber recently retained Mr. Kress to lobby on federal educational
issues, particularly on the NCLB reauthorization, which is scheduled to
begin next year.
While the most prominent business groups are backing the law?s testing
requirements, some leading companies are looking for significant changes.
The Partnership for 21st Century Skills, which includes technology and
education companies such as Microsoft Corp., Pearson Education, and LeapFrog
Schoolhouse Inc., wants assessments that can assure that students have
gained more than basic academic knowledge during their school careers. The
Tucson, Ariz.-based group also counts nonprofits such as the National
Education Association, the American Federation of Teachers, and the American
Association of School Librarians among its members.
The partnership?s approach measures ?higher-order thinking skills? rather
than simply the ?memorization of facts? that schools stress under the
current systems, said Joel Packer, the director of education policy and
practice for the 3.2 million-member NEA.
?We would hope that [business leaders] recognize that you can have
accountability, but you want to make sure it?s fair,? he added.
Susan Traiman, the director of public policy for the Business Roundtable,
said the coalition her group is building with the U.S. Chamber is focused on
reading and math achievement because those are the essential skills that all
future workers need to master.
While the coalition of groups working with the BRT hasn?t taken an official
stance on the Partnership for 21st Century Skills? proposal, Ms. Traiman
doubts that the states would be able to take on such a large expansion of
testing.
?The question is whether we currently have the capacity in education to
assess these additional skills on a statewide basis in a valid and reliable
way,? she said.
Broader Agenda
Despite the current focus on the No Child Left Behind law, the U.S. business
community has a larger education agenda?one that extends from preschool to
college.
In a report earlier this year, the Committee for Economic Development
advocated universal preschool for 4-year-olds. Also this year, it said that
American schools should dramatically increase the availability of
foreign-language instruction and require high school graduates to show an
understanding of other countries? geography and cultures.
?You can see how it?s increasingly important to learn about other countries
and other cultures, and learn to speak other languages,? said John Brademas,
the president emeritus of New York University in New York City and a CED
trustee.
Mr. Brademas, a Democratic member of Congress from Indiana from 1959 to
1981, was a leader in the effort to pass the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act in 1965. He said that business leaders played no role in
pushing that measure through Congress.
The Business of Education
Three major U.S. business groups, all based in Washington, with a wide range
of interests in education policy, have recently stepped up their efforts to
influence the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act.
BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
Members: 165 chief executives of major U.S. companies
Education agenda: Working with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in a coalition
to improve the NCLB law. The groups support the law?s accountability and
testing rules, especially annual testing to measure whether students are
making progress toward reaching proficiency in reading and math. The
roundtable has set a goal of doubling the number of college students
graduating with majors in science, math, engineering, and technology by
2015. Improving the quality of K-12 math and science instruction is vital to
meeting that goal, the group says.
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Members: 3,000 state and local chambers of commerce, representing 3 million
businesses
Education agenda: Is working with the Business Roundtable to support the
NCLB law as Congress prepares to reauthorize it. Recently started the
Institute for a Competitive Workforce, which convened a meeting this month
of K-12 policymakers and business leaders to discuss important issues in
education policy and how business leaders can be involved. The institute
also plans to issue report cards on states? education policies.
COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Members: More than 170 business executives, academics, and philanthropic
leaders
Education agenda: Advocating voluntary preschool programs for all
4-year-olds. Promoting foreign-language instruction and international
education as a way to help students become better prepared to enter the
workforce.
SOURCE: Education Week
The Business Roundtable has set a goal of doubling the number of U.S.
college graduates with degrees in mathematics, science, engineering, or
technology by 2015. It is advocating changes to teacher preparation and K-12
policies to achieve that goal.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently established an institute that will
focus on educational issues related to preparing students for a future in
the workforce.
All of those efforts have one goal in common: to make American workers of
the future economically competitive.
?We see there?s kind of an umbrella issue that all students graduate high
school [ready for] college and work,? said Ms. Traiman of the BRT. ?They?re
all falling in under that broad objective.?
While corporate campaign contributions often open doors on Capitol Hill, one
House aide said that business leaders also bring credibility to the debate
over education policy because they are advocating changes, not resisting
them.
?Their perspective is different than everyone else?s,? said Vic Klatt, the
staff director for Republicans on the House Education and the Workforce
Committee. ?All of the education groups are first and foremost worried about
their members and maintaining the status quo. The business community has no
interest in the status quo.?
But Mr. Packer of the NEA said that the business community?s stance on the
NCLB law is incomplete because it has been ?largely silent? in the debate
over funding for the program, which rose dramatically in the years after
Congress passed it, but leveled off in the past two years.
?If you think these are good policies,? he said, ?you should be pushing for
resources for them.?
Priscilla Gutierrez
Outreach Specialist
New Mexico School for the Deaf
....change is inevitable, growth is optional...
Post a Message to arn-l: