[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Debbie Smith, Aug. 3, 1948 - Oct. 22, 2007, true American hero


  • To: noyre@yahoogroups.com
  • Subject: Debbie Smith, Aug. 3, 1948 - Oct. 22, 2007, true American hero
  • From: Bussardre@aol.com
  • Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:57:19 EDT
  • Cc: DBSinFLA@aol.com, arn-l@interversity.org, gbracey1@verizon.net, susano@gmavt.net, berliner@asu.edu

Dear folks:

It is with the heaviest of hearts that I inform you of the passing of Debbie
Smith of Orlando, who perhaps more than anyone else I know was responsible
for shedding light on the dark side the year-round school calendar movement
and the people pushing it. She was only 59.

Debbie departed this morning at 10 a.m. after a long battle with breast
cancer. She waged her first battle against cancer in the early 1990s and was
diagnosed with a recurrance about three years ago.

It was the well-researched information Debbie put together that triggered my
attention as a journalist to the suspect school calendar change movement
and its operatives and that provided ammunition for parents and groups all
over this country to stand their ground against the school calendar change
agents.

I promised her before she died that I would finish my year-round book, which
has had many setbacks because of my own family's health crises. I have asked
her husband and daughter to hound me until I finish the book, which I will
dedicate to her.

Below is an excerpt from a chapter in my book, about 3/4 complete, that I
wrote shortly after Debbie's cancer came back with a vengence some 14 years
later. Debbie read and approved it. I hope it will give you some insight into
the remarkable person she was. She really never got the credit she deserved
as a year-round school opposition force. She is truly an unsung hero in the
ongoing war against public education. I will never forget her.

I am sure Debbie's family members will appreciate your notes of condolence.
Write to Jeff and Amanda Smith, 5433 Rustic Pine Court, Orlando, FL
32819-7129.

Billee Bussard

About Debbie Smith
Debbie Smith got involved with theyear-round school issue as
Education Committee Chairman of the Orange County Homeowners Association, a
politically active group representing some 20,000 Orlando area property owners. She
agreed to chair the committee in 1989, the year her husband Jeff became
association president and her daughter Amanda, their only child, was a first-grader
at Dr. Phillips Elementary, which was slated to go on a year-round calendar.
Her research and subsequent reports led the homeowners group to pass a
resolution Nov. 19, 1991 calling for the school board to return three pilot
year-round schools to a traditional calendar as soon as possible and to not expand
the calendar in other Orange County schools. Orange County school officials
were pushing to make all 85 elementary schools year-round by 1995.

The homeowners “Resolution Opposing Year-Round School” was a direct slap
against 56-year-old Dee Parsons, who sat in 1992 as chairman of the Orange
County School Board. It was none other than Parsons who in 1985 initiated
efforts to switch the district’s calendar. Parsons, a Republican, was first elected
to the school board in 1984, just a year after Republican President Ronald
Reagan’s education secretary released A Nation At Risk, which called for
drastic school reform, including a longer school year, as a means to compete in
a global marketplace. A year after Parsons joined the school board, the
National Governors Association, headed by Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, issued a
report with a recommended list of education reforms that included all schools
switch to a year-round calendar within a few years. Much was at stake
politically for Parsons, who by then had positioned himself among Florida’s
year-round school leaders determined to make Central Florida, and the Orange County
school district specifically, a showcase for calendar reform.
The National Association FOR Year-Round Education had, in fact, staked out
Florida to begin an east coast expansion, with central Florida as a major
focal point. Florida, in fact, had received federal money during the Bush (41)
administration for educational leadership that set up a statewide network of
school reform change agents poised to work for calendar reform. “Project Lead”
money also paid for a 134-page monograph published in 1993 singing praises
of Florida’s year-round calendar efforts that was written and distributed
nationwide precisely as the Florida pilot program was imploding because of high
costs, poor testing outcomes and parent dissatisfaction. That fact was left
out of the monograph.
By the 1992-93 school year, 32 of Florida’s 50 year-round schools were in
six central Florida counties--Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and
Volusia. In 1990, Orange County placed three schools on a multitrack year-round
calendar. Beginning in school year 1993-94, half of Orange County’s 85
elementary schools and a third of Seminole elementary and middle schools were
scheduled to be on a year-round calendar, with the goal to place all elementaries
and some middle schools in both districts on it by 1995.
The process had been underway for years. NAYRE first sent its operatives to
lobby influential, business and political leaders and state officials. In
1987, NAYRE kingpins addressed the Florida Committee of 100, and shortly
thereafter Florida TaxWatch, a conservative watchdog group, signed onto year-round
school. The first conference of the Florida Association for Year-round
Education (FAYRE, Inc.), supported by a grant from the Florida Department of
Education, was held Oct. 28-29 1990, in Orlando.
During the early1990s, two Florida year-round school change agents would
reign as president of NAYRE: One was R.J. “Skip” Archibald, who as an elected
(1984) school superintendent in Marion County made his school district
Florida’s pilot for year-round education in 1987, a year after the National
Governors embraced calendar change.
Archibald’s Marion County School District is 60 miles northwest of Orange
County. He presided as President of the Florida Association of Year-Round
Schools at its first convention in 1990. In NAYRE’s annual directory of year-round
schools for the 1992-93, Archibald, then president, is identified as Chief
Executive Officer, Cooperative Education Extension System of Florida,
University of North Florida. The job was created for him by Florida Education
Secretary Betty Castor after Archibald decided to NOT seek re-election for school
superintendent in 1992, and after he was turned down in April 1992 for the
appointed post of Seminole County school superintendent.
“It cost Marion County about $750,000 more a year to operate a multitrack
school instead of a traditional calendar,” said John Smith, who succeeded
Archibald.
The other NAYRE president from Florida was L. Diane Locker, Orange County
year-round school coordinator, who presided over the group in school year
1995-96. NAYRE convention-goers from all over the country got instructions from
her on the “The Politics and Planning” for a year-round school calendar.
Postings about year-round school on the Prodigy bulletin board, a relatively
new computer information exchange service launched in 1987, did not come to
Debbie’s attention until after she had written reports for the homeowners
group. Prodigy was to become a popular and effective source of information on
school calendar developments, providing a nationwide hookup to parents and
educators engaged in calendar fights. A Christmas gift from her husband in
1992 was, in fact, the Prodigy service, which Debbie used to continue following
year-round school developments. ....
Ironically, when Debbie showed up at her first school board meeting in 1989
to do research for the homeowners group, she was inclined to believe an
all-year school year might be a good idea. She had a background in education,
having graduated from Louisiana State University with a degree in home economics
education. But her perspective quickly changed to doubt after listening to
presentations by groups of parents at that meeting who, after doing their
homework on year-round school organized in opposition to the pilot programs at
three Orlando schools: Aloma, Palm Lake and Tangelo Park. Research by these
parents provided a stark contrast to the mostly positive picture of the
multitrack calendar painted in reports generated by school officials.
Debbie spent thousands of hours in libraries looking at professional
journals and other publications. She also spent countless hours attending
informational and school board meetings on year-round school and double-checking
information supplied by the Orange County school administration. Her spare bedroom
was soon overflowing with piles of news clips, research reports and other
documents. Pulling facts and figures from the mounds of research, she wrote with
great clarity on the dangers and detriments of calendar change to unnerve
the Orange County calendar change forces
Haunting Facts on ‘Phantom’ Schools
Debbie Smith determined from her research that one of the biggest
misrepresentations on calendar change benefits was the promised savings from “phantom”
schools. These are the bricks and mortar schools that the district wouldn’
t have to build by using a multitrack calendar to expand capacity in
existing school buildings. Orange County school officials estimated savings of
nearly $64 million over three years every time a year-round calendar was used to
avoid construction of 9 “phantom” schools at construction costs of about $7
million a piece plus miscellaneous expenses. It’s false economics, she
concluded.
“These large projected savings—$64 million—have the effect of dazzling the
mind and preventing closer evaluation,” Debbie would write later in the OCHA
News, the homeowners association newsletter.
“Because YRS cost so much more to operate yearly, if you multiply the costs
out over a five- or six-year period you could afford to build and operate the
so-called ‘phantom school.’ At the end of this period you would have
purchased the land and building for the same money, rather than just having money
paid out in increased operating costs with nothing tangible to show for it.”
Debbie’s detailed explanation of the problems with the year-round calendar
concept appeared in a special 9-page February 1992 edition of OCHA News. The
special issue was published in response to a letter Dee Parson’s sent to the
homeowners group charging Debbie’s research and presentations as biased and a
misrepresentation of fact. [Parson’s letter and excerpts from Debbie’s
rebuttal are provided in the book] Debbie’s article in the OCHA News begins:
“Mr. Parsons’ letter . . . suggests that I have only presented ‘biased’
information to [OCHA] membership. I find this a particularly ironic accusation
as I have attended many YRS presentations…by Orange Counting Public School
staff and other supporters of YRS and have never attended one where there was a
true pro/con discussion of the issues. These have only been what they choose
to call ‘information sessions’ where administration staff have tied to ‘sell
’ this program to the public. . .
“As to who is biased in presenting information…I quote from The Year-Round
Education Task Force Report, dated 11/12/91:
“The concept of year-round education was brought to the attention of the
Orange County school system staff as early as 1985 when School Board member Dee
Parsons suggested that the district consider it as an alternative which might
address the growing student population in Orange County. A district
objective was developed to review the results of legislative efforts. . . relative to
year-round schools and report on implications for Orange County by June 30,
1987.
“Mr. Parsons was one of the first and remains one of the strongest
proponents of the YRS program, but that does not necessarily mean he is right.
Especially in light of more recent information that I have reviewed from school
districts which have operated these programs for a number of years. I prefer to
think of our resolution as a list of serious concerns rather than biased
information.”
Debbie’s rebuttal concludes with the following points:
1. Money that should be going to educating children in the classroom
and into teachers’ salaries is going instead into an expensive new scheduling
system.
2. If you have read this entire special YRS newsletter then you should
be questioning the statement by Mr. Parsons that YRS is the only significant
alternative to solving space problems.
San Diego City Schools, the home base of the NAYRE, now has strict
guidelines for putting schools on multitrack. They have found portables to be much
cheaper. They are also putting restrictions on schools going single track
because they do their student counts daily and so many children are absent during
the summer, it is costing them too much money. Diane Fardig’s report [for
Orange County] states that parents and students were very happy with
intercessions at the Tangelo Park (YRS pilot). But I found it interesting that
enrollment went down with each succeeding intercession, the lowest enrollment being
during the summer. There was a difference of almost 100 children.
1. YRS does not decrease class size. You have five third grades on
traditional and you’ll have five third-grades on YRS. They just won’t be in
school at the same time. The only way to reduce class size is to hire more
teachers.
2. There is great debate over the issue of whether YRS actually
improves academics.
3. It is my hope that the next time you attend a YRS “information
session,” that you will now be able to listen with a whole new level of knowledge.
If you agree that there is merit to our concerns, then perhaps you will
consider taking the next step in the process and let your school board members
know that you are concerned. When they see empty auditorium seats, and don’t
receive phone calls on an issue, they assume everything is fine and you are
happy with their decisions.
A copy of Dee Parsons’ letter also was submitted and printed as Letter to the
Editor in the Feb. 6, 1992 issue of The West Orange Times. The paper printed
Smith’s rebuttal letter Feb. 27, 1992.
Dee Parsons’ attempt to discredit Debbie Smith followed her effective
presentations on the detriments of calendar change in surrounding counties.
In mid-November 1991, she was asked by a parent to speak to the Osceola
County School Board. Debbie’s Osceola presentation fell a week before she was
scheduled to give the same talk at a hearing
of the Orange County school board on whether to expand the year-round
calendar to ALL schools by 1995. Debbie believes the Orange County hearing was
deliberately scheduled the week of Thanksgiving when many families that otherwise
might have attended the meeting were busy with company or headed out of
town. And so turnout was low at the school calendar change hearing.
Her willingness to help other districts may have undermined efforts in her
own. The Orange County school board voted to expand YRS to 60 schools after
her abbreviated presentation at the hearing. She explained the situation in
the OCHA News:
“Through a long series of events, I was contacted by a parent in Osceola
County who was upset because the school board was voting to expand [the
year-round calendar] after only a couple of months into their pilot year (sound
familiar?). She wanted to know if I had any information I could share with her.
I explained that I happened to have these packets [of information] made up
[for the Nov. 26 presentation to the Orange County School Board] and I would
be glad to bring them down and present this information to the Osceola County
School Board.
“The Osceola School Board allowed me time to present my information, asking
numerous questions. After listening to me and concerned parents from their
county, they voted that night four to one to not expand its
program, to form a committee to do further research on the issue, and to
put YRS on the ballot in March (later changed to November) for a non-binding
vote. “This was a major accomplishment as it is the first time I know of that
parents and property owners in any county of Florida have ever had a chance
to vote on YRS.
“The only problem with doing this presentation in Osceola was that I was
sure that much of the information that I discussed that evening would prejudice
my ability to do the same presentation the next week in Orange County.
“Sadly, I was right. On the evening before the public hearing in Orange
County, I received a call from the school board secretary informing me that Mr.
Parsons (newly elected as school board chairperson) had decided to limit
individual presentations from the public to five-minute intervals. I was told
that this was going to be strictly enforced.
“You should know that under Mr. Bill Barnes, the immediate past chair for
the school board, discussion was allowed to continue as long as new information
was being presented or as long as it took to thoroughly cover an issue.
This is the premise I used in putting these [information] packets together. I
had assumed that my complete packet of information opposing YRS would be
heard and, since so much of my information was current, here was a good chance
that the school board members would not have had this kind of input from
anyone else.
“At the beginning of my presentation, I explained that I wanted to read my
resolution into the record and hopefully what they heard in the resolution
would be of such a nature as to have them waive the five-minute rule and let me
present the back-up [information in the] packet.
“Mr. Drew Thomas, school board attorney, was keeping time and as I finished
the first page of the resolution, he announced that 51/2 minutes had elapsed.
I attempted to get my time extended but was curtly informed that I had to
sit down.
“I then informed Mr. Parsons that he should be aware of the fact that this
same packet of information had been presented in Osceola County the week
before and based on the information therein along with citizen concerns had caused
them to agree to put the issue on the ballot for a vote. I was extremely
disappointed that our school board was unwilling to consider my information,
but under their rules I had to retire the podium.
“Of the literally thousands of people who could and should, have been
at this hearing, there were only five people who spoke to the resolution and
a handful more in attendance. It is for this reason that I have gone into
such detail in giving you this summary of events surrounding the hearing to
consider input before voting to expand YRS into every elementary school in
Orange County by 1995.”
This account in the OCHA News, along with the resolution and Debbie’s
lengthy rebuttal to the school board’s arguments for year-round calendar, was later
circulated nationwide and proved to be
dynamite in blowing apart efforts of school calendar change agents
elsewhere. It helped prepare parents and educators there for the year-round calendar
propaganda war and the nasty political maneuvering that often accompanies it.
As a journalist trying to assess whether year-round school had merit, it was
an instructive read. It also provided a basis for comparison of stories from
other communities where the arguments and the political maneuverings for
calendar change were eerily similar.
NAYRE’s Orange County operatives won the short-term battle, but it was a
costly victory because it provided the resolve for Debbie and other Orange
County parents to assist parents across the nation with information that stopped
similar efforts dead in their tracks.
Debbie's closing words in the OCHA Newsletter proved to be prophetic:
“If we don’t do something, in less than a few years we will be in the same
position as Marion County, Fla. The YRS programs will ultimately fail after
the public has had to actually live with the YRS calendar multitracking for
3-4 years. School board and administration staff responsible for bringing YRS
to the district will loose their jobs and most importantly, in this time of
tight budgets, public funds will have been wasted and additional funds will
be required to dismantle the program and return to a traditional calendar.”
Orange County returned to a traditional calendar in school year in 1995-96.
To my knowledge, there is no final analysis of what this experiment cost.
Orange County Superintendent James Schott, in charge when the mechanisms for
converting to a year-round calendar were put in place, would leave to become
director of an Orlando arts group.
Locker would move to another state and take an administrative job in
education.
Marion County School Superintendent Archibald would become an unsuccessful
candidate for Superintendent of Seminole County but land a cushy job that paid
$100,000--a job created for him by Florida Education Secretary Betty Castor,
a year-round school proponent. [Details in a later chapter.]
Both Archibald and Locker would continue as year-round consultants,
commanding as much as $2,000 a day, and would continue to be participants and
presenters at NAYRE conventions.
Debbie Smith was paid exactly NOTHING for the research she did for the
homeowners group.
In summer 1992, just a few months after the Orange County School Board voted
to put some 60 schools on a year-round calendar, Debbie would be diagnosed
with Hodgkin’s disease AND breast cancer. Now needing all the energy she could
must for the fight of her life, Debbie bowed out of the Orange County fray
for the time being, but between chemo therapy and doctor appointments, she
continued to research the issue and help people from all over the state and the
country who called needing calendar research. She was confident the eventual
undoing of year-round school would be its expansion efforts because
experiences in other communities had shown the more parents, children and educators
who experience the calendar, the louder the noise becomes against it and the
greater pressure to end it.
While recovering from her illnesses inthe early 1990s, she became something
of a stealth force in Florida’s calendar wars. She quietly assisted Florida
groups around the state who found the year-round school pitchmen on their
doorsteps. She alerted a group of activists to a state-level school facilities
advisory committee meeting held in Orlando the day before Thanksgiving in which
critical decisions on the year-round calendar were up for a vote. To the
surprise of the committee members, which included lawyers from high-profile law
firms and construction companies, more than a dozen activist showed up armed
with facts and figures that swayed a final recommendation by the committee
to back away from using a year-round calendar in the state’s master plan for
Florida school facilities. [More on this in a later chapter.]
Debbie also alerted a network of activists to a little-known Legislative
hearing on year-round school in Orlando, which filled an auditorium with some
400 people, most of them opponents of year-round school. The turnout was all
the more remarkable because so many who had come from all corners of the state
had to drive through high winds and torrential rains of a tropical storm
that swept the state that day. The high turnout of angry parents and educators
forced lawmakers to keep a hearing expected to last from 7 to 9 p.m. going
until nearly midnight and proved to be a setback for more legislation to
encourage a move to a year-round calendar. [More on this in another chapter.]
Along the way, Debbie made many new friends from all over the state and the
country. They were liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans,
agnostics as well as Christian-right activists. Topping the list of fiery
calendar warriors was Nancy Stacy, a mother of four from Ocala who effectively led
the fight against Florida’s year-round calendar pilot program in Marion
County and who, like Debbie, shared her research with people from all over the
country.
Nancy was the first real obstacle to NAYRE’s Florida’s push, and was the
organizations worst nightmare. The petite blonde mother of four has
indefatigable energy, and an inquiring mind. Like Debbie, she was a stay-at-home mom
who had the time to check out NAYRE’s claims. Her research included speaking
directly with officials in school districts across the country that had
experimented with a year-round school calendar to counter NAYRE claims of academic
and cost benefits. Copies of Nancy’s research, which included letters and data
from school districts around the nation refuting year-round school success
stories, would also find their way across the country to defeat school
calendar change proposals during the 1990s in school districts coast to coast,
including Oregon, Washington, Maine and Maryland.
Debbie also became part of the NOYRE network, a by-invitation-only chat
group founded by Wes Walker, an Arizona father of 7. NOYRE moderator is Rodger
Holtin, an Arkansas Dad with a great instant recall of year-round school
facts and figures.

. The NOYRE group has included people from all religious, political and
economic backgrounds—from college professors and researchers to parents who
were just plain frustrated with year-round school and its politics. They
included Maryland lawyer Robert Rosenfeld, who as a parent did several “legal briefs”
in opposition to year-round school, thoroughly documenting each point,
often with hard data he retrieved personally from school districts across the
nation. Like many parents, he spent hundreds of dollars out of his own pocket
gathering the information. The information he presented to the Montgomery
County school board became known as the Rosenfeld papers and were widely
circulated.

In the days before Internet websites, the Rosenfeld Papers, like the OCHA
News letter written by Debbie Smith, were vital documents in thwarting summer’s
Grinch—the year-round school movement.





************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com



Post a Message to arn-l:

Your name:

Your email address: (use the exact address you are subscribed with)

Subject line:

Message: