[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Tales from the Crypt
- Subject: Re: Tales from the Crypt
- From: Art Burke <aburke@VANSD.ORG>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:08:54 -0700
- Reply-to: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
- Sender: Assessment Reform Network Mailing List <ARN-L@LISTS.CUA.EDU>
Kids are considered adults in matters of giving consent for medical treatment at younger ages, 15, I think, in Oregon. That's what was in the back of my mind when thinking about Juanita's comments. Art
>>> 5alive31@HOME.COM 09/24 11:03 AM >>>
B"H
I think that if they are 18 years of age, they would be able to do that . .
. but until then, they are MINORS!!! If you gave them the right to take a
test against parent disapproval, you could also say they could take sex
education, could participate in sports, could take driver's education . . .
all without parent approval.
This would never fly.
Remember, if tests are part of the approved curriculm, then we can see them;
if they are not part of the approved curriculm, then they are
extra-curricular, and can't require our children participate.
They can't have it both ways!!!
Michelle
From: Juanita Doyon <Jedoyon@AOL.COM>
To: ARN-L@listsrva.CUA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tales from the Crypt
In a message dated 9/24/01 8:27:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
aburke@VANSD.ORG writes:
Suppose a court were to rule that kids of high school age could choose to
take the test in the face of a parent's disapproval?
I suppose then we would have to examine whether specific forms of coercion
were being utilized by schools to persuade students to go against their
parent's wishes.
Juanita
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the ARN-L list, send command SIGNOFF ARN-L
to LISTSERV@LISTS.CUA.EDU.
Post a Message to arn-l: