[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Large Scale Evaluation in Education as Euphemism WAS: Politicians Out of Step with Public on NCLB
- To: arn-l@interversity.org, American Evaluation Association Discussion List <EVALTALK@BAMA.UA.EDU>
- Subject: Large Scale Evaluation in Education as Euphemism WAS: Politicians Out of Step with Public on NCLB
- From: Rick Parkany <rparkany@borg.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:02:27 -0400
- Cc: arn2-strategy <arn2-strategy@yahoogroups.com>, rparkany@borg.com
- In-reply-to: <44F862A8.1000101@earthlink.net>
- Organization: Prometheus Educational Services
- References: <44F862A8.1000101@earthlink.net>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Yes! let's give these fascists who've taken over the right-wing of the
Republican Party in the Palace Coup of 2000 the heave-ho IF they don't
declare Marshall Law after the Nov 06 elections like I predict they will
AFTER some crisis or other they help to foment, losing the Congress as
they're sure to do.
BUT, remember! this has been a long time comin'--AND the Great Enabler,
Bubba Clinton and HIS good ol' Boy/Gal network a la Hilton Head
Conferencing Fame (predating the Cheney Energy Clique policy-making coup
of early 2001), set up the machinations that inspired the Bush Admin to
USE DoEdn to ruin public education instead of abolishing it as they
tried to do under Newt a decade earlier (sa well as w/the HUD Dept ),
REMEMBER? This has been going on in deep Corporate Planning at least
since 1982 and that Corporate screed & farce: *A Nation At Risk!*
DON'T expect ANYthing approaching reform IF you just expect the DemoPubs
to do anything LIKE what we need and articulate this list (Assessment
Reform List <
http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/subscribe.html >.
IF the political naivity of the American Public is as deep-rooted as I
feel it is, things may only get worse until we reverse the Supreme Court
ruling that dictated that Cash-Money <=> Speech. Until THEN, the
Corporate Citizen will continue to reign unabated in its policies and we
citizens of the flesh, born as WE are of a mother's womb, will continue
to practice charades at the polls as the Corporate Citizen's agenda goes
on without skipping a beat... ;-} rap.
"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism
because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
-- Benito Mussolini
(Encyclopedia Italiana,Giovanni Gentile, ed.).
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/PromOriginal/EconomyOfWar/EconomicsOfWar.html
--
"Dein Wachstum sei feste und lache vor Lust!
Deines Herzens Trefflichkeit
Hat dir selbst das Feld bereit',
Auf dem du bluehen musst." JS Bach: Bauern Kantata
Richard A. Parkany: Prometheus Educational Services
http://www.borg.com/~rparkany/
Upper Hudson & Mohawk Valleys; New York State, USA
Bob Schaeffer wrote in the ARN (Assessment Reform List):
FEDS, PUBLIC AT ODDS OVER NCLB
BUSH ADMINISTRATION: "NOT MUCH NEEDED IN THE WAY OF CHANGE;" ONLY
THREE IN 10 AMERICANS AGREE
ESchool News -- September 1, 2006
As the first major update to the federal No Child Left Behind Act
(NCLB) draws near, supporters and opponents of the law are staking out
their positions on its various measures. The result of these debates
will determine how schools must operate going forward. And if a recent
survey is to be believed, there is a significant disparity in how the
public, and the Bush administration, view the law.
In an interview with reporters on Aug. 30, Education Secretary
Margaret Spellings said NCLB is close to perfect and needs little
change. That contrasts sharply with the results of a new Phi Delta
Kappa (PDK)/Gallup poll, showing only three in 10 people have a
favorable opinion of the law--and just 26 percent say it is helping
public schools.
"I talk about No Child Left Behind like Ivory soap: It's 99.9 percent
pure or something," Spellings told reporters. "There's not much needed
in the way of change."
Spellings' comments signal what amounts to the Bush administration's
starting position as the law comes up for renewal. That is scheduled
to happen as soon as next year.
It is unsurprising that Spellings strongly supports the law. She
helped craft it as President Bush's domestic policy chief and now
enforces it as the top education official.
Yet her view that the law needs little change is notable, because it
differs so sharply from others with a stake--including many teachers,
school administrators, and lawmakers.
Already, the House education committee is holding hearings on how to
improve the law. So is a prominent bipartisan commission, which is
touring the nation to gather opinions.
More than 80 organizations have signed a statement urging fundamental
changes, in areas such as how student progress is measured and how
schools are penalized when they fall short. And the National
Conference of State Legislatures has given the law a scathing rebuke.
"You cannot ignore reality," said Reg Weaver, president of the
National Education Association, the largest teachers union in the
country. "The reality is that poll after poll speaks to the concerns
that people have. They are not arguing with the goals. They are not
arguing with accountability. But they say something needs to be done
to fix this law."
In the latest of these polls--the 38th annual "Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup
Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools," released
Aug. 22--nearly six in 10 Americans said they believe NCLB has had no
effect on the nation's schools or has actually harmed them.
"This finding is significant and disturbing, given that the nation's
schools are spending virtually all of their available money and
resources on an effort to meet the demands of this law," said Lowell
Rose, co-author of the survey.
The PDK/Gallup poll finds there is widespread support for the law's
goals--closing the achievement gap between minority students and their
white peers, and improving educational outcomes for all students--but
broad disagreement with its specific strategies.
When asked whether testing students in only English and math, as
currently required by NCLB, can give a fair picture of a school, 81
percent of the public say no--and 78 percent said they are worried the
law's focus on these two subjects will mean less emphasis on other
subjects. In addition, two-thirds of those surveyed said they oppose
measuring school success by the percentage of students passing a
single statewide test, while 81 percent said they prefer measuring the
improvement students make during the year.
Signed by President Bush in 2002, the law is widely considered the
most significant federal education act since Congress approved its
original version in 1965.
It aims to ensure that all children can read and do math at grade
level by 2014, an aspiration that has placed unprecedented demands on
schools. The law requires states to increase testing, raise teacher
quality, and give more attention to minority children.
Poor schools that receive federal Title I aid but don't make enough
progress face a series of escalating consequences. But critics of the
law say too many of these consequences divert valuable resources from
the schools that need them most--and, according to the PDK/Gallup
poll, the public seems to agree.
When asked where policy makers should focus efforts to improve
education, 71 percent of those surveyed said they would prefer
improvement to come through the existing public school system, rather
than through an alternative system.
Sixty percent of respondents said they oppose the use of public funds
for children to attend private schools; 80 percent said they'd prefer
that students who attend schools that fail to meet NCLB performance
requirements receive help in their own schools, rather than offers to
transfer to another school; and 69 percent opposed contracting out to
private companies the operation of local school systems.
The poll's results "should send a clear message to those interested in
improving our schools that change proposals should be built on the
assumption that the people like the schools they have," Rose said.
"Proposals based on the assumption that [public] schools are failing
are unlikely to gain the public support needed to make them effective."
Spellings has made her mark as education secretary by enforcing the
law with flexibility.
In areas such as tutoring and testing, she has approved experiments to
see what might work better--an approach that has won her praise.
"I think it would be foolhardy for me to sit up here and just say
we're not going to react to anything that we're learning over time,"
she said in her Aug. 30 interview with reporters at the Education
Department.
Spellings said her job is to present Congress with good data to help
lawmakers do their job. She said she is open-minded about ways to
improve the law.
But when asked if she meant the law is truly "99.9 percent" close to
working properly, she said, "I think it is that close."
She pointed as much to attitudes as test scores.
Now, she said, states and schools are debating how better to help
children with limited English skills and students with disabilities.
"Just the level of sophistication of the conversation around these
issues is, to me, the big news out of No Child Left Behind," she added.
William Bushaw, executive director of Phi Delta Kappa International,
an association of education professionals that has been advocating for
high-quality education for all students since 1906, took a different
view.
"The views expressed in this year's PDK/Gallup poll should serve as a
wake-up call to our nation's policy makers as they begin the process
of reauthorizing NCLB in 2007," he said. "The public rejects the
punitive approach found in NCLB, favors a broad curriculum, prefers
more appropriate measures of school performance than a single
high-stakes test, and supports efforts targeted at helping our most
vulnerable students."
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=6574
-------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe ARN-L:
http://interversity.org/lists/arn-l/subscribe.html
Post a Message to arn-l: