[
Author Prev][
Author Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Author Index][
Thread Index]
Linda Darling-Hammond's testimony
- To: ARN State <ARN-state@yahoogroups.com>, ARN Main List <arn-l@interversity.org>, ndsg Study Group <ndsgroup@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Linda Darling-Hammond's testimony
- From: Peter Campbell <campbellp@mail.montclair.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:28:32 -0700
http://www.forumforeducation.org/foruminaction/index.php?page=399
This is Linda Darling-Hammond's testimony before the House Education
and Labor Committee on the Re-Authorization of NCLB.
Notice that she focuses on competitiveness as the lynchpin of her
argument.
So does this indicate that anti-NCLB'ers like Darling-Hammond accept
the competitiveness rationale? Or is this Darling-Hammond being cagey,
knowing that the only thing that will get the attention of politicians
is to couch everything inside of the competitiveness frame?
If the former, it reminds me of Lakoff's point about "tax relief."
(
http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/projects/strategic/simple_framing)
We don't question the whole notion of "competitiveness" as a ridiculous
canard.
(
http://transformeducation.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-competition-and-
education.html)
Peter Campbell
Post a Message to arn-l: