[ Author Prev][ Author Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Author Index][ Thread Index]
States Omit Minorities' School Scores--seems a shame people so want to be in on it.....
- To: ca-resisters@interversity.org
- Subject: States Omit Minorities' School Scores--seems a shame people so want to be in on it.....
- From: Rich Gibson <rgibson@pipeline.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:37:51 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=pipeline.com; b=o1y+xGQQ6TFipvhcjVKt7OMx82DxUWuNGoD/+slkmVFCkUHIsGthSx7+AKyLV5kv; h=Received:Message-Id:X-Sender:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
AP: States Omit Minorities' School Scores
By FRANK BASS, NICOLE ZIEGLER DIZON and BEN FELLER, Associated Press
Writers 13 minutes ago
States are helping public schools escape potential penalties by skirting
the No Child Left Behind law's requirement that students of all races must
show annual academic progress.
With the federal government's permission, schools aren't counting the test
scores of nearly 2 million students when they report progress by racial
groups, an Associated Press computer analysis found.
Minorities who historically haven't fared as well as whites in testing
make up the vast majority of students whose scores are being excluded, AP
found. And the numbers have been rising.
"I can't believe that my child is going through testing just like the
person sitting next to him or her and she's not being counted," said
Angela Smith, a single mother. Her daughter, Shunta' Winston, was among
two dozen black students whose test scores weren't broken out by race at
her suburban Kansas City, Mo., high school.
Under the law championed by President Bush, all public school students
must be proficient in reading and math by 2014, although only children
above second grade are required to be tested.
Schools receiving federal aid also must demonstrate annually that students
in all racial categories are progressing or risk penalties that include
extending the school year, changing curriculum or firing administrators
and teachers.
The U.S. Education Department said it didn't know the breadth of schools'
deliberate undercounting until seeing AP's findings.
"Is it too many? You bet," Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said in
an interview. "Are there things we need to do to look at that, batten down
the hatches, make sure those kids are part of the system? You bet."
Students whose tests aren't being counted in required categories include
Hispanics in California who don't speak English well, blacks in the
Chicago suburbs, American Indians in the Northwest and special education
students in Virginia, AP found.
Bush's home state of Texas once cited as a model for the federal law
excludes scores for two entire groups. No test scores from Texas' 65,000
Asian students or from several thousand American Indian students are
broken out by race. The same is true in Arkansas.
One consequence is that educators are creating a false picture of academic
progress.
"The states aren't hiding the fact that they're gaming the system," said
Dianne Piche, executive director of the Citizens' Commission on Civil
Rights, a group that supports No Child Left Behind. "When you do the math
... you see that far from this law being too burdensome and too onerous,
there are all sorts of loopholes."
The law signed by Bush in 2002 requires public schools to test more than
25 million students periodically in reading and math. No scores can be
excluded from the overall measure.
But the schools also must report scores by categories, such as race,
poverty, migrant status, English proficiency and special education.
Failure in any category means the whole school fails.
States are helping schools get around that second requirement by using a
loophole in the law that allows them to ignore scores of racial groups
that are too small to be statistically significant.
Suppose, for example, that a school has 2,000 white students and nine
Hispanics. In nearly every state, the Hispanic scores wouldn't be reported
because there aren't enough to provide meaningful information.
State educators decide when a group is too small to count. And they've
been asking the government for exemptions to exclude larger numbers of
students in racial categories. Nearly two dozen states have successfully
petitioned the government for such exemptions in the past two years. As a
result, schools can now ignore racial breakdowns even when they have 30,
40 or even 50 students of a given race in the testing population.
Students must be tested annually in grades 3 through 8 and at least once
in high school, usually in 10th grade. This is the first school year that
students in all those grades must be tested, though schools have been
reporting scores by race for the tests they have been administering since
the law was approved.
To calculate a nationwide estimate, AP analyzed the 2003-04 enrollment
figures the government collected the latest on record and applied the
current racial category exemptions the states use.
Overall, AP found that about 1.9 million students or about 1 in every 14
test scores aren't being counted under the law's racial categories.
Minorities are seven times as likely to have their scores excluded as
whites, the analysis showed.
Less than 2 percent of white children's scores aren't being counted as a
separate category. In contrast, Hispanics and blacks have roughly 10
percent of their scores excluded. More than one-third of Asian scores and
nearly half of American Indian scores aren't broken out, AP found.
Ms. Smith's family in Missouri demonstrates how the exemptions work.
Shunta' and other black children in tested grades at Oak Park High School,
which is in a mostly white suburban Kansas City neighborhood, weren't
counted as a group because Missouri schools have federal permission not to
break out scores for any ethnic group with fewer than 30 students in the
required testing population.
"Why don't they feel like she's important enough to rearrange things to
make it count?" her mother asked.
In all, the tests of more than 24,000 mostly minority children in Missouri
aren't being counted as groups, AP's review found. Other states have much
higher numbers. California, for instance, isn't counting the scores of
more than 400,000 children. In Texas, the total is about 257,000.
State educators defend the exemptions, saying minority students'
performance is still being included in their schools' overall statistics
even when they aren't being counted in racial categories.
Scott Palmer, a consultant for the Council of Chief State School Officers
in Washington, said he hoped critics will focus on the 23 million children
whose scores are being counted by schools rather than those whose scores
aren't reported separately.
"There's a huge positive feeling for the notion" of making schools
accountable, Palmer said. "It's a huge plus."
Spellings said she believes educators are acting in good faith. "Are there
people out there who find ways to game the system? Of course," she said.
"But on the whole ... I fully believe in my heart, mind and soul that
educators are people of good will."
Bush has hailed the separate accounting of minority students as a vital
feature of the law. "It's really essential we do that. It's really
important," Bush said in a May 2004 speech. "If you don't do that, you're
likely to leave people behind. And that's not right."
Nonetheless, Bush's Education Department continues to give widely varying
exemptions to states:
_Oklahoma lets schools exclude the test scores from any racial category
with 52 or fewer members in the testing population, one of the largest
across-the-board exemptions. That means 1 in 5 children in the state don't
have scores broken out by race.
_Maryland, which tests about 150,000 students more than Oklahoma, has an
exempt group size of just five. That means fewer than 1 in 100 don't have
scores counted.
_With one of the most diverse school populations in the nation, Florida
has been allowed to create a special "provisional," or probationary,
category for schools that are failing to meet the law's requirements. The
deal helped reduce the number of failing Florida schools from 73 percent
in 2003 to 37 percent in 2004.
_Washington state has made 18 changes to its testing plan, according to a
February report by the Harvard Civil Rights Project. Vermont has made
none. On average, states have made eight changes at either the state or
federal level to their plans in the past five years, usually changing the
size or accountability of subgroups whose scores were supposed to be counted.
Toia Jones, a black teacher whose daughters attend school in a mostly
white Chicago suburb, said the loophole is enabling states and schools to
avoid taking concrete measures to eliminate an "achievement gap" between
white and minority students.
"With this loophole, it's almost like giving someone a trick bag to get
out of a hole," she said. "Now people, instead of figuring out how do we
really solve it, some districts, in order to save face or in order to not
be faced with the sanctions, they're doing what they can to manipulate the
data."
Some students feel left behind, too.
"It's terrible," said Michael Oshinaya, a senior at Eleanor Roosevelt High
School in New York City who was among a group of black students whose
scores weren't broken out as a racial category. "We're part of America. We
make up America, too. We should be counted as part of America."
Spelling's Education Department is caught between two forces. Schools and
states are eager to avoid the stigma of failure under the law, especially
as the 2014 deadline draws closer. But Congress has shown little political
will to modify the law to address their concerns. That leaves the racial
category exemptions as a stopgap solution.
"She's inherited a disaster," said David Shreve, an education policy
analyst for the National Conference of State Legislatures. "The 'Let's
Make a Deal' policy is to save the law from fundamental changes, with
Margaret Spellings as Monte Hall."
The solution may be to set a single federal standard for when minority
students' scores don't have to be counted separately, said Ross Wiener,
policy director for the Washington-based Education Trust.
The law originally created the exemptions to make sure schools didn't
unfairly fail schools or compromise student privacy when they had just a
small number of students in one racial category, Wiener said.
But there's little doubt now that group sizes have become political, said
Wiener, whose group supports the law.
"They're asking the question, not how do we generate statistically
reliable results, but how do we generate politically palatable results,"
he said.
___
Associated Press Writers Laura Wides-Munoz in Miami, Nahal Toosi in New
York and Garance Burke in Kansas City contributed to this report.
On the Net:
U.S. Education Department: http://www.ed.gov/
Post a Message to ca-resisters:
|